- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Oregon
- /
- Oregon Business & Industry v. Oregon Environmental Quality Commission
Oregon Business & Industry v. Oregon Environmental Quality Commission
Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2026
Status
Motion to expedite filed by petitioners.
Geography
Docket number
n/a
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Oregon Court of Appeals (Or. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States → Oregon Climate Protection Program
At issue
Lawsuit brought by industry groups, companies, and unions challenging the the Oregon Climate Protection Program rule adopted by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
04/16/2026
Motion to expedite filed by petitioners.
Motion
–
04/16/2026
Petition for judicial review filed.
On April 16, 2026, industry groups, companies, and unions filed a lawsuit in the Oregon Court of Appeals challenging the Oregon Climate Protection Program rule adopted by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission (EQC). The petitioners alleged that the “massive compliance costs” associated with the program’s “steeply declining caps on critical fuel supplies such as natural gas, propane, gasoline, and diesel” would result in “billions of dollars in higher energy costs for Oregonians.” The petitioners also filed a motion requesting that the court expedite the case to minimize potential economic impacts. In their motion, the petitioners contended that the rule’s structure was “essentially similar” to an earlier iteration that the Court of Appeals <a href="https://www.climatecasechart.com/document/northwest-natural-gas-v-environmental-quality-commission_e0aa">invalidated</a> for failing to follow required procedures. The motion contended that the new iteration of the rule failed to address substantive legal flaws, included no protections for Oregonians from increased energy costs, failed to include a specific cost-benefit analysis, and overstepped the EQC’s authority.
Petition
–
Summary
Lawsuit brought by industry groups, companies, and unions challenging the the Oregon Climate Protection Program rule adopted by the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance