- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Canada
- /
- Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development and Others v. Attorney General of Canada and Imperial Oil
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development and Others v. Attorney General of Canada and Imperial Oil
About this case
Filing year
2008
Status
Application granted
Geography
Court/admin entity
Canada → Federal Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global) → Natural resource extraction (Global)
Principal law
Canada → Environmental Assessment Act (S.B.C. 2018, c 51)
At issue
Challenge to government panel approval of oil sands mine
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
Summary
Federal Court of Canada found legal errors in a government joint review panel’s environmental assessment of the Kearl Tar Sands Project. Ecojustice and several non-profit organizations challenged the panel’s approval of the project, alleging that it had failed to seriously consider the climate change impacts of the project. The court agreed with the petitioner, holding that the panel failed to adequately support their conclusion that the project would cause only insignificant environmental harm.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance