- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- People v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
People v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
CGC24618323
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Enforcement Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → State Law—Nuisance
At issue
California attorney general's action against Exxon Mobil Corporation in connection with plastic pollution in the state.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
09/23/2024
Complaint filed.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a complaint in California Superior Court against Exxon Mobil Corporation (ExxonMobil) alleging that the company “caused or substantially contributed to the deluge of plastic pollution that has harmed and continues to harm California’s environment, wildlife, natural resources, and people.” In addition, the complaint alleged that ExxonMobil deceived Californians “by promising that recycling could and would solve the ever-growing plastic waste crisis.” California’s complaint included allegations that ExxonMobil misled customers regarding greenhouse gas reduction benefits of its “advanced recycling” process. The complaint asserted that claims of significant greenhouse gas reductions through advanced recycling “are based on selective data presentation and problematic assumptions that mislead consumers.” The complaint asserted causes of action for public nuisance under the California Civil Code; for equitable relief for pollution, impairment, and destruction of natural resources under California Government Code Section 12607; for water pollution under the California Fish and Game Code; and for violations of the False Advertising Law, Environmental Marketing Claims Act, and Unfair Competition Law. The complaint requested that the court compel the defendant to abate the public nuisance, including through establishment of an abatement fund and that the court also order ExxonMobil to cease and desist public statements related to its plastic operations, including statements regarding “advanced recycling.” Other relief sought included temporary and permanent equitable relief to prevent pollution, impairment, and destruction of natural resources, as well as civil penalties and disgorgement.
Complaint
–
Summary
California attorney general's action against Exxon Mobil Corporation in connection with plastic pollution in the state.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance