- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Plastic Pollution Coalition v. Danone Waters of America, LLC
Plastic Pollution Coalition v. Danone Waters of America, LLC
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Stipulation of dismissal filed.
Geography
Docket number
2024-CAB-004562
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → D.C. Superior Court (D.C. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States
At issue
Greenwashing lawsuit against the company that imports and sells evian bottled water the District of Columbia.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
08/29/2025
Stipulation of dismissal filed.
On August 29, 2025, Plastic Pollution Coalition (the Coalition) and defendant Danone Waters of America, LLC (Danone) stipulated to the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the Coalition’s greenwashing suit alleging that Danone violated the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act by making false and misleading representations regarding the “sustainability” and “natural” quality of evian bottled water products. On August 19, the parties notified the court that they had agreed to a settlement of the matter.
Stipulation
–
08/19/2025
Joint status report filed.
Status Report
–
05/23/2025
Joint motion to stay granted.
Decision
–
03/18/2025
Motion to dismissed denied.
The District of Columbia Superior Court denied a motion to dismiss Plastic Pollution Coalition’s lawsuit alleging that the company that imports and sells evian bottled water in the District of Columbia violated the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act by making false and misleading representations regarding the “sustainability” and “natural” quality of evian products. Alleged misrepresentations regarding “sustainability” included statements that the defendant used 100% renewable energy and references to a “carbon neutral” certification that the defendant was no longer seeking as of 2023, as well as other statements regarding use of recycled and recyclable materials. The court found that the complaint sufficiently pleaded that the defendant “made aspirational statements and is not taking steps of fulfilling those aspirations.” The court also rejected the defendant’s argument that federal law preempted claims regarding evian’s “natural spring water” label and found that claims regarding statements on labels raised questions of fact and could not be dismissed.
Decision
–
07/19/2024
Complaint
–
Summary
Greenwashing lawsuit against the company that imports and sells evian bottled water the District of Columbia.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance