- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. Regents of the University of California
Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. Regents of the University of California
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Petitions for writ of mandate granted.
Geography
Docket number
RG19022887
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to environmental review for the Upper Hearst Development Plan for Goldman School of Public Policy and Minor Amendment to the 2020 Long Range Development Plan for Berkeley, including failure to assess or mitigate impacts on climate change.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
08/23/2021
Petitions for writ of mandate granted.
The court found that the university's environmental review was legally insufficient and that a reduced enrollment alternative should have been considered. Climate change issues were not discussed in the court's decision.
Decision
–
06/13/2019
Petition for writ of mandate filed.
Petition
–
Summary
Challenge to environmental review for the Upper Hearst Development Plan for Goldman School of Public Policy and Minor Amendment to the 2020 Long Range Development Plan for Berkeley, including failure to assess or mitigate impacts on climate change.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance