- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Alaska
- /
- Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic v. Bureau of Land Management
Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic v. Bureau of Land Management
Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Unopposed motions to dismiss the appeal without prejudice granted.
Geography
Docket number
21-35085
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States → Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenges to approval of a development plan for major oil and gas development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
03/09/2021
Unopposed motions to dismiss the appeal without prejudice granted.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed without prejudice an appeal of the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction in cases challenging the Willow project, a major oil development project in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. In February, the Ninth Circuit temporarily enjoined certain construction work for the duration of the appeal. The plaintiffs agreed to dismissal of the appeal after the oil and gas company agreed not to take certain actions until December 1, 2021.
Decision
–
02/13/2021
Appellants' motions for injunctive relief granted.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the continuation of a temporary injunction on certain construction activities related to a major oil and gas development project in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska while the plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of their motions for a preliminary injunction. The district court concluded that the plaintiffs were unlikely to succeed on their National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) claims because the claims were time-barred under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act (NPRPA). The Ninth Circuit found that the plaintiffs raised a serious question regarding whether the NPRPA’s time limit on filing claims for judicial review applied in this case. The Ninth Circuit further found that the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, that at least one of their NEPA claims was likely to succeed if timely, that the balance of equities favored relief, that the balance of hardships tipped sharply in the plaintiffs’ favor, and that an injunction was in the public interest.
Decision
–
Summary
Challenges to approval of a development plan for major oil and gas development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Fossil fuel
Economic sector