Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Sustainability Institute v. Trump

Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Government's motion for stay pending appeal granted.
Docket number
26-2040
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (4th Cir.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → First Amendment (US)Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Article I (U.S. Constitution)United States → First AmendmentUnited States → Inflation Reduction Act of 2022United States → Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)United States → Presentment ClauseUnited States → Separation of Powers DoctrineUnited States → Ultra Vires
At issue
Document with title of Sustainability Institute v. Trump
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Search results
08/20/2026
Government's motion for stay pending appeal granted.
In a four-sentence order, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the federal government’s emergency motion for a stay pending appeal of a July 22, 2026 district court order directing that Inflation Reduction Act’s Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant Program (ECJ Program) funds be made available through September 30, 2026. In the emergency motion, the federal government argued that the plaintiffs were not likely to succeed in defending the injunction on appeal because ECJ Program funds were not available due to Congress’s rescission of the funds. The government also argued that the district court did not and could not require EPA to obligate ECJ Program funds. In addition, the government argued that the district court’s preliminary injunction would irreparably harm the government and the public interest by requiring the disbursement of more than $1 billion that might never be recovered and by placing “an extreme administrative burden on EPA.” The government contended that the plaintiffs’ interest in the preliminary injunction was “relatively minimal,” including because they could seek damages in the Court of Federal Claims. One judge would have denied the motion.
Decision
–
08/12/2026
Response filed by appellees in opposition to appellants' motion for stay pending appeal.
Community groups' and cities' lawsuit alleging that the Trump administration had unlawfully and arbitrarily frozen federal grant funds, including for programs and projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Response
–
08/04/2026
Emergency motion filed by government for stay pending appeal.
Community groups' and cities' lawsuit alleging that the Trump administration had unlawfully and arbitrarily frozen federal grant funds, including for programs and projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Motion
–

Summary

Community groups' and cities' lawsuit alleging that the Trump administration had unlawfully and arbitrarily frozen federal grant funds, including for programs and projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

 Topics mentioned most in this case

See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance