- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- TruOjai, LLC v. County of Ventura
TruOjai, LLC v. County of Ventura
Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2018
Status
Writ of mandate denied.
Geography
Docket number
56-2018-00515555-CU-WM-VTA
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to Ventura County ordinance that banned short-term rentals in Ojai Valley.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
06/23/2020
Writ of mandate denied.
A California Superior Court rejected claims that Ventura County failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it adopted an ordinance that imposed strict compliance requirements for temporary rental units, including short-term rentals and homeshares, and banned short-term rentals in the Ojai Valley. The petitioner alleged that the ordinance would result in environmental impacts, including increased traffic and vehicle miles traveled and increased greenhouse gas emissions due to additional trips required for visitors to drive to and from lodging. The court found that the County established the ordinance was covered by two CEQA exemptions: the "Class 8" exemption for actions that "assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment" and the "common sense exemption" for actions for which "there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." The court concluded that the County appropriately relied on these exemptions based on the ordinance's likely preservation of long-term housing stock. With respect to the Class 8 exemption, the court found that the ordinance did not fall into an exception to the exemption for actions for which there is a reasonable possibility that the action will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Among other points, the court said the petitioner's argument that vehicle miles traveled would increase due to increased miles traveled by tourists did not account for the possibility that allowing short-term rentals would increase vehicle miles traveled because people who worked in Ojai Valley would have to live further away.
Decision
–
Summary
Challenge to Ventura County ordinance that banned short-term rentals in Ojai Valley.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance