Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

United States v. California

Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2026
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
2:26-cv-00107
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsE.D. Cal.
Case category
Federal Statutory ClaimsOther Statutes and RegulationsConstitutional ClaimsOther Constitutional Claims
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Senate Bill 1137United StatesFederal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)United StatesMineral Leasing Act (MLA)United StatesProperty ClauseUnited StatesSupremacy Clause
At issue
Lawsuit brought by the United States challenging a California law that imposes setback restrictions on fossil fuel operations near "sensitive receptors."
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
01/14/2026
Complaint filed.
The United States filed a lawsuit challenging a California law (<a href="https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB1137/id/2606996">SB 1137</a>) enacted in 2022 that restricts fossil fuel operations within 3,200 feet of certain “sensitive receptors” such as homes, schools, and health care facilities. SB 1137’s legislative findings cited “increasing impacts of climate change” and “a growing body of research” showing “direct health impacts from proximity to oil extraction,” that disproportionately impact communities most vulnerable to the negative impacts of climate change. The law stated that “[f]urther assistance must be provided to frontline communities that have been most polluted by the fossil fuel industry by cleaning up pollution, remediating negative health impacts, and building resilient infrastructure to prepare for the unavoidable impacts of climate change.” The U.S. asserted that federal law preempted SB 1137’s restrictions because their “categorical prohibition on certain fossil fuel development on federal lands … stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of Congress’s objectives … to promote the responsible development of fossil fuel resources on federal lands,” as reflected in the Mineral Leasing Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, and other federal statutes. In addition, the U.S. asserted that the California law conflicted with the Constitution’s Property Clause by interfering with property interests in the federal mineral estate and violated the intergovernmental immunity doctrine by directly regulating the federal government.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit brought by the United States challenging a California law that imposes setback restrictions on fossil fuel operations near "sensitive receptors."

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance