Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Washington v. Federal Emergency Management Agency

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Memorandum filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for summary judgment.
Docket number
1:25-cv-12006
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsOther Constitutional ClaimsFederal Statutory ClaimsOther Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States42 U.S.C. § 5133 (Predisaster hazard mitigation)United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesAppointments ClauseUnited StatesAppropriations ClauseUnited StatesDisaster Mitigation Act of 2000United StatesDisaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (DRRA)United StatesInfrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)United StatesSpending Clause
At issue
Challlenge brought by 20 states to the termination of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) pre-disaster mitigation program, which states used for climate resilience projects, and the repurposing of BRIC funds.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
10/15/2025
Memorandum filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
08/05/2025
Motion for preliminary injunction allowed.
The federal district court for the District of Massachusetts granted plaintiff states’ motion for a preliminary injunction barring the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other federal defendants from spending funds allocated to the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) pre-disaster mitigation program for non-BRIC purposes until the court renders a final judgment.
Decision
07/16/2025
Complaint filed.
Twenty states filed a lawsuit on July 16, 2025 claiming that termination of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) pre-disaster mitigation program and repurposing BRIC funds violates separation of powers and is contrary to law in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, and that withholding appropriated funds violates separation of powers, the Appropriations Clause, and the Spending Clause, and is also contrary to law in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The states also challenged the authority of the acting FEMA Administrators to terminate the BRIC program. In addition, they asserted an equitable ultra vires claim. The states alleged that the shutdown of the program had forced communities across the country “to delay, scale back, or cancel hundreds of mitigation projects depending on this funding,” including climate resilience projects.
Complaint
07/16/2025
Memorandum filed in support of motion for preliminary injunction.
Motion

Summary

Challlenge brought by 20 states to the termination of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) pre-disaster mitigation program, which states used for climate resilience projects, and the repurposing of BRIC funds.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Climate finance