- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Whitewater Draw Natural Resource Conservation District v. Mayorkas
Whitewater Draw Natural Resource Conservation District v. Mayorkas
Geography
Year
2016
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2016
Status
Dismissal of two claims and summary judgment for remaining claims affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
20-55777
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit claiming that Department of Homeland Security failed to consider environmental impacts, including impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, of discretionary immigration actions.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
07/19/2021
Dismissal of two claims and summary judgment for remaining claims affirmed.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security on claims that the Department violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to consider environmental impacts of certain immigration programs and policies. The plaintiffs—identified as environmentalists, environmental groups, natural resource conservation districts, and cattle ranchers—alleged, among other things, that the immigration actions resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions. The Ninth Circuit found that a manual that described how the Department would implement NEPA was not a final agency action subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act, and that immigration “programs” challenged by the plaintiffs, including Temporary Protective Status and long-term nonimmigrant visas, were not discrete agency actions subject to review. The Ninth Circuit ruled that the plaintiffs did not have standing for their remaining claims.
Decision
–
Summary
Lawsuit claiming that Department of Homeland Security failed to consider environmental impacts, including impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, of discretionary immigration actions.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance