- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Idaho
- /
- Wildlands Defense v. Brummett
Wildlands Defense v. Brummett
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Amended complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:21-cv-425
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Idaho (D. Idaho)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Forest Service’s approval of the Sage Hen Integrated Restoration Project in the Boise National Forest, including for failure to consider climate change impacts on bull trout.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
11/15/2021
Amended complaint filed.
On November 15, 2021, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that added claims under the Endangered Species Act.
Complaint
–
11/01/2021
Complaint filed.
On November 1, 2021, four conservation groups filed a NEPA lawsuit in federal court in Idaho challenging the U.S. Forest Service’s approval of the Sage Hen Integrated Restoration Project in the Boise National Forest. The complaint alleged that the project may include up to 19,900 acres of commercial timber harvest, up to 83.1 miles of temporary roads, prescribed fire treatments on between 35,000 and 45,000 acres, and hazardous fuels reduction and non-commercial thinking on 11, 200 acres. The allegations included that the project area contains critical habitat for bull trout, which are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, and that the Forest Service failed to examine climate change impacts to bull trout critical habitat and bull trout populations.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Forest Service’s approval of the Sage Hen Integrated Restoration Project in the Boise National Forest, including for failure to consider climate change impacts on bull trout.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance