- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Switzerland
- /
- ZAD de la Colline, Holcim, Switzerland
ZAD de la Colline, Holcim, Switzerland
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Pending
Geography
Court/admin entity
Switzerland → Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Protesters (Global)
Principal law
International Law → European Convention on Human RightsSwitzerland → Criminal Law
At issue
1) Whether a penal order issued for an unidentified person was valid and whether unidentified persons could oppose such penal orders
2) Whether the protest was protected by articles 10 and 11 ECHR (freedom of expression and assembly), and/or article 17 (state of necessity) of the Swiss Criminal Code.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
Summary
In October 2020, activists organized the first ZAD (Zone à Défendre) in Switzerland (ZAD de la Colline du Mormont) in the canton of Vaud. Several hundred people occupied a Holcim opencast mine to protest against open-pit mining for cement production and its impacts on climate and biodiversity. At the end of March 2021, the police evacuated all ZADists and arrested around 145 people. While around 50 were allowed to leave the zone without identity checks and about 25 people could leave after identity checks, approximately 70 people were arrested after having refused to reveal their identities. Most of them underwent identification measures (such as DNA sampling) and body searches. Several individual proceedings followed the evacuation even though Holcim withdrew its complaint. The accused persons who had refused to give their identities were denied their right to oppose the penal order delivered by the Public Ministry and sentenced to unconditional prison terms of two to three months for unlawful entry, prevention of an official act, and contempt of official orders (Arts. 186, 286, 292 CC).
On appeal up to the Federal Court, the judges overturned these verdicts and allowed the “unknown” activists to oppose their penal order. In the meantime, some of the unknown activists revealed their identity and successfully opposed their DNA profiling. In the trials of the activists whose identities were known to the authorities all were acquitted in the first instance of the charge of unlawful entry (the prosecution maintained the charge despite Holcim's withdrawal of the complaint). Most of the activists were also acquitted of the charge of contempt of official orders. Several people were convicted of preventing an official act. The public prosecutor's office has appealed against several acquittals and the Cantonal Court has overturned some of them. While some proceedings are still ongoing, most of them are over and executive judgments vary from acquittals to (suspended) fines and day-fines.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance