petition

Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Paraná vs. Federal Environment Agency (IBAMA) and Environment Agency of the State of Paraná (IAT) - petition

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Litigation

Sabin

Sabin Litigation

decision

Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Paraná vs. Federal Environment Agency (IBAMA) and Environment Agency of the State of Paraná (IAT) - decision

judgment

Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Paraná vs. Federal Environment Agency (IBAMA) and Environment Agency of the State of Paraná (IAT) - judgment

Filing Year For Action

On May 11, 2020, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) and the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of Paraná (MPPR), filed a public civil action (environmental class-action) against the Federal Environment Agency (IBAMA) and the Environment Agency of the State of Paraná (IAT). The plaintiffs argue that Order 4.410/2020, issued by the Minister of the Environment, changed the previous understanding on the prevalence of the Atlantic Forest Law (Federal Law 11.428/2006) over the Forest Code (Federal Law 12.651/2012). The previous understanding considered the Atlantic Forest Law specialty in regulating this biome. The plaintiffs argue that the new understanding to apply the Forest Code, which is a less protective general rule, would allow the consolidation of occupation of protected areas (APP) illegally deforested (until July 22, 2008). They emphasize the need for the provisions of the Atlantic Forest Law to prevail due to the specialty and greater protection afforded to the biome. They highlight the importance of the biome and the contribution of its deforestation to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, arguing that the National Policy on Climate Change (PNMC – Federal Law 12.187/2009) provides for preservation of biomes considered to be National Heritage, such as the Atlantic Forest. As a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs request a series of administrative measures to prevent the cancellation of environmental infraction notices issued by the state of Paraná in the event of unauthorized suppression, cutting and/or use of remaining Atlantic Forest vegetation, and that the state environmental agency (IAT) refrain from approving documents that consolidate occupation in protected areas (APP) on properties in the Atlantic Forest with suppressed vegetation. In the final instance, they request that the injunctions be confirmed and that the IAT refrain from granting environmental licenses in favor of activities in APPs in the Atlantic Forest in disagreement with the special legislation.

In their defense, IBAMA and IAT argued that there is no antinomy between the Atlantic Forest Law and the Forest Code, claiming that the Forest Code created an exceptional regime to govern deforested areas consolidated over time in a less rigorous manner, which is applicable to any biome. Both requested that the initial claims be dismissed.

The lower court granted the preliminary injunction requested by the plaintiffs. It considered the special nature of the Atlantic Forest Law, which seeks stricter legal protection for the biome.  Based on the principles of prevention and precaution, the judge held that the application of the Forest Code's provisions in the Atlantic Forest biome could result in serious damage to the environment. 

The ruling upheld the case and partially granted the claims, ordering: (i) the IAT and IBAMA to refrain from canceling environmental infraction notices, embargo and interdiction terms and seizure terms in the state of Paraná and referring to the Atlantic Forest biome; (ii) the IAT not to approve Rural Environmental Registrations (CARs) that are intended to consolidate improper occupation of Permanent Preservation Areas (PPAs) and legal reserves on properties in the Atlantic Forest biome; and (iii) the IAT to stop granting environmental licenses for projects in PPAs located in the Atlantic Forest biome, without due observance of specific protective legislation. It was determined that the measures should be complied with immediately, without being conditional on the offering of a bond and subject to a fine for each act of non-compliance, due to the postulate of prevention, precaution and the principle of in dubio pro natura. The decision highlighted important points such as: (i) the significant size of the Atlantic Forest biome and that forests play the role of climate regulators, contributing to the stabilization and reduction of average temperatures; (ii) the impacts of global warming generated by the irrational use of natural resources combined with deforestation; (iii) the use of market mechanisms, such as the carbon credit market, to protect the Atlantic Forest; and (iv) the economic benefits obtained from the ecological services provided by nature, i.e. maintaining ecological integrity by conserving biodiversity, conserving water and water services, regulating the climate, conserving and improving the soil, among others.

During the judgment of the motion for clarification filed against the ruling, the court fully maintained the dispositive part of the ruling but supplemented the reasoning of the decision already issued. It argued that the issued ruling reinforces environmental protection and, among the grounds for the decision, dedicated a sub-topic to the issue of climate change, asserting that there is a consensus that forest degradation can impact the climate due to CO2 emissions and the impairment of its function as a thermal regulator.

IAT and IBAMA filed an appeal against the issued ruling. The Federation of Agriculture of the State of Paraná (FAEP) and the Paraná Association of Forestry-Based Companies (APRE), as legal representatives of third parties adversely affected, also appealed.

Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Paraná vs. Federal Environment Agency (IBAMA) and Environment Agency of the State of Paraná (IAT)

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

This sector involves the wholesale and retail selling of goods.

Terrestrial means "of the earth" and relates to the risks to ecological system that includes all living organisms and their interactions within land-based environments, such as forests, grasslands, and deserts.

Any compulsory, unrequited payment to the government levied on corporations or individuals. This can be for environmental reasons, such as introducing a Carbon tax to set a price that emitters must pay for the greenhouse gases they emit.

Activities that involve the cultivation of crops and raising of livestock for food, fibre, and other products essential for human life and industry.

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

Activities that involve planning, designing and building infrastructure, residential, and commercial structures.

This sector involves the distribution, treatment, and conservation of water resources.

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater, coastal and marine systems to climate change.

Activities that provide lodging, food, and entertainment services to guests, including hotels, restaurants, and resorts.

Work that is productive and delivers a fair income, security in the workplace and social protection for all, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organize and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity.

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater systems to climate change.

Activities of government agencies and institutions that provide public services, enforce laws and manage public resources.

The processes through which enterprises can identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence is the idea that reasonable precautions should be taken to avoid causing harm to people, the environment, or society. It also involves identifying and mitigating risks before they occur.

This sector involves activities to move goods and people, alongside the storage of products.

Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Paraná vs. Federal Environment Agency (IBAMA) and Environment Agency of the State of Paraná (IAT) - petition

Policy instrument

Risk

Just transition

Economic sector

Adaptation/resilience

Finance