Notice of motion and supplementary papers.

In 2013, Impact Africa Limited applied for an exploration right to search for oil and gas in the Transkei and Algoa exploration areas off South Africa’s Eastern Cape coast. The Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy granted exploration right 12/3/252 on April 29, 2014. The right was renewed in 2017 and again in 2021. Shell Exploration and Production South Africa B.V. and BG International Limited subsequently acquired interests in the project. In October 2021, Shell’s consultants announced an intended 3D seismic survey along the south-eastern coast. 

On December 2, 2021, Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC, residents and fishers from affected communities, the Dwesa-Cwebe Communal Property Association and All Rise Attorneys for Climate and Environmental Justice instituted proceedings in the Eastern Cape High Court. Natural Justice and Greenpeace Environmental Organisation subsequently joined the proceedings. The applicants sought an interim interdict preventing the seismic survey pending judicial review of the exploration right and its renewals.

On December 17, 2021, the South African High Court held a hearing on Part A (an application for an interdict where the Applicants sought an order interdicting the 3rd, 4th and 5th Respondents from proceeding with a seismic survey pending the finalization of the relief). On December 28, 2021, the High Court granted the interim interdict. It found that the applicants had established a prima facie right based on the alleged failure to conduct meaningful consultation. It also found a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm to the affected communities’ cultural and spiritual practices, livelihoods and use of marine resources. The Court held that the balance of convenience favored the applicants and that the statutory process proposed by the respondents did not provide an adequate alternative remedy. It acknowledged the concern of the communities that seismic survey will lead to exploration without climate impact assessment, a development that is inconsistent with South Africa’s agreement at the 2021 COP26 to move away from hydrocarbon-based energy towards climate friendly renewables. While finding the balance of convenience to be in favor of the applicants, the Court reasoned that the financial loss that respondents, especially Shell and Impact Africa, are likely to suffer cannot compare with the adverse effects of infringement of the constitutional rights of the communities. Finally, the Court reasoned that the procedure contemplated under section 47 of the MPRDA and argued by the respondents as a remedy is unacceptable in that it is a time-consuming procedure. If followed, it would allow the continuous threat of infringement of the applicants’ rights. Shell and Impact Africa appealed the judgment of the High Court. On February 17, 2022, the judge dismissed the application. 

The main review application was heard on May 30-31, 2022. On September 1, 2022, the High Court reviewed and set aside the original exploration right and its two renewals.

The High Court found that the consultation process had been procedurally unfair. Notices were published in newspapers that did not circulate within some affected communities and were written in English and Afrikaans, although the communities were predominantly isiXhosa-speaking. The consultation process had principally involved traditional leaders and other identified stakeholders rather than direct engagement with the broader affected communities. The High Court also found that the decision-maker had failed to consider relevant matters, including possible harm to marine and bird life; the precautionary principle; the communities’ livelihoods and cultural and spiritual relationships with the sea; climate-change considerations; and the requirements of the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act 24 of 2008. It further found that the environmental management programme did not substantiate its statements concerning employment, government revenue and socioeconomic benefits. The Court concluded that the decisions were reviewable under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 and the principle of legality. In regard to the climate change impacts of the proposed seismic surveys, the Court referred to the applicants’ submissions regarding observed climate change impacts – including more unpredictable weather patterns and more extreme weather events – as well as expert testimony relating to unburnable fossil fuel reserves (i.e., most fossil fuel reserves should remain unextracted in order to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius) and the inconsistency of further oil and gas exploitation with South Africa’s international climate change commitments. 

The Minister, Shell, Impact Africa and BG International appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal. On June 3, 2024, the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s findings concerning the inadequacy of the consultation process and the failure to consider relevant matters. It did not endorse the High Court’s broader statement that authorizing new oil and gas exploration was inconsistent with South Africa’s international climate-change commitments. The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the High Court had failed to consider a just and equitable remedy under section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution after finding the decisions unlawful. In reconsidering the remedy, it took account of the period between the grant of the right and the review proceedings, expenditure of approximately R1.1 billion, asserted economic and social benefits, the companies’ remaining opportunity to seek a renewal and the moratorium on new offshore exploration applications.

Impact Africa and BG International had submitted an application for a third renewal on July 21, 2023. The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the findings of unlawfulness but suspended the High Court’s orders setting aside the right and its renewals pending determination of that third-renewal application. Its reasons contemplated a further public-participation process as part of the renewal proceedings.

On July 2, 2024, the applicants appealed the suspension order to the Constitutional Court. They also sought to pursue their argument that a separate environmental authorization was required under the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998. Shell, Impact Africa and BG International filed conditional cross-appeals challenging the setting-aside of the right and its renewals.

On August 27, 2024, the Constitutional Court dismissed the companies’ conditional cross-appeals. It also declined to hear the environmental-authorization issue because neither the High Court nor the Supreme Court of Appeal had adjudicated it and the Constitutional Court would therefore have been considering it as a court of first instance.

The remaining appeals were heard on September 16, 2025. On August 14, 2026, the Constitutional Court delivered judgment. Kollapen J wrote the majority judgment, with Maya CJ, Mathopo J, Mhlantla J, Musi AJ, Theron J and Tshiqi J concurring. Rogers J wrote a dissenting judgment, in which Savage J concurred. The majority agreed with the Supreme Court of Appeal that the High Court had been required to consider a just and equitable remedy and that its failure to do so permitted appellate reconsideration. However, it held that the Supreme Court of Appeal had misdirected itself in suspending the setting-aside order. The majority identified three problems with the Supreme Court of Appeal’s remedy. First, it treated the defects as if they could be cured principally through further consultation, although the High Court’s findings also included failure to consider climate change, the Integrated Coastal Management Act, the precautionary principle and applicable statutory requirements. Second, it contemplated addressing consultation required at the initial application stage under section 79 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act through a renewal proceeding under section 81, which does not provide for consultation of that kind. Third, it did not specify who would conduct the consultation, how it would be conducted or how its results would be incorporated into the renewal decision. The majority held that consultation was part of the affected communities’ right to participate in decisions concerning their land, culture and livelihoods. It found that consultation conducted more than a decade after the original decision would not remedy the failure to consult the communities at the initial application stage.

The majority also considered whether the matter should be remitted for reconsideration under section 79. It held that remittal commonly follows the setting-aside of administrative action but is not automatic. Whether to remit depends on what is just and equitable in the circumstances. The original application and environmental management programme dated from 2013. The majority found that the factual, scientific and legal circumstances had since changed, including through the introduction of the One Environmental System. It held that reconsideration would require updated environmental information, a new environmental management programme and fresh consultation. In its view, this would amount in substance to a new application rather than reconsideration of the existing one.

The majority also considered the companies’ expenditure. It found that Impact Africa had contributed to the inadequate consultation process and that Shell had acquired its interest subject to the legal vulnerabilities associated with that process. It held that the expenditure did not outweigh the other factors relevant to the remedy. The majority further found that remittal would permit the companies to proceed with what was substantively a new application without being subject to the moratorium applicable to new offshore applications. It therefore declined to suspend the invalidity or remit the original application.

The Constitutional Court upheld the appeals, set aside the Supreme Court of Appeal’s order and replaced it with an order dismissing the appeals from the High Court. The effect was to restore the High Court’s setting-aside of the 2014 exploration right and its two renewals. The opposing state and corporate respondents were ordered to pay the applicants’ costs, subject to separate costs orders concerning the environmental-authorization and procedural-record issues.

The majority stated that setting aside the decisions did not amount to a substituted decision refusing exploration on its merits. If the offshore moratorium is lifted or successfully challenged, the companies may submit a new application under the legal and environmental requirements then applicable. The original right, its renewals and the pending third-renewal process cannot provide the basis for future exploration.

In dissent, Rogers J would not have interfered with the Supreme Court of Appeal’s remedial discretion. Alternatively, he would have allowed the responsible decision-maker to determine whether the companies should receive a final three-year exploration period. This could have occurred through a modified third-renewal process or through reconsideration of the original application following fresh consultation, subject to a prohibition on any further renewals. The dissent considered the majority’s remedy equivalent in substance to a substituted refusal and would have required reconsideration of the application after consultation and consideration of all relevant environmental, cultural, social and economic matters.

Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC and Others  v. Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy and Others

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC and Others  v. Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy and Others - application

Filed

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Zoning and spatial planning are both methods for guiding the distribution of people and activities in a space, and are regulatory restriction.

A ban is a legal action that prevents the sale or supply of a product or service, or that recalls a product from the market. Examples are bans on SF6, greenwashing, fossil fuel advertisement or single-use plastics.

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater systems to climate change.

Actions to adapt human health, healthcare systems and well-being to climate change.

Coastal zone and marine-related actions and measures to adapt and increase resilience to climate change

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater, coastal and marine systems to climate change.

Hot temperature extremes are daily maximum temperatures  that were exceeded on average once in a decade or once in 50 years, and includes heatwaves.

Actions to reduce emissions in energy generation and supply.

Risks to the ecosystem health of the marine environment, including ocean warming, ocean acidification, and ocean deoxygenation, harming biodiversity, species health, ecosystem services, and coastal community livelihoods.

Extreme weather refers to events where a weather variable exceeds (or falls below) a threshold. Meaning it is significantly different from the average or usual weather pattern.

Air pollution involves harmful contaminants in the air, affecting both indoor and outdoor environments. It can lead to health issues like respiratory diseases and heart problems, and climate impacts such as global warming. Pollutants can damage plants, trees, habitats, and water bodies like rivers and lakes.

Energy derived from biological compounds that are renewable due to their short life cycle within the carbon dioxide cycle.

Social inclusion is the process of improving the terms on which individuals and groups take part in society—improving the ability, opportunity, and dignity of those disadvantaged on the basis of their identity.

Electricity generation from devices driven by the movement of salt water, differences in saltwater temperatures, or salinity gradients.

Production of electricity and heat from solar irradiation.

Kinetic energy of airflow transformed into useful energy, mostly electrical energy.

Oil is a combustible liquid fossil fuel composed mainly of hydrocarbons, occurring as crude oil and refined into petroleum products such as petrol, diesel and kerosene.

Fossil gas, commonly known as natural gas, is a fossil fuel consisting chiefly of methane with smaller amounts of other hydrocarbons and trace gases, found in underground deposits.

People with different national or cultural traditions from the dominant population

Social and cultural groups that share collective ancestral ties to the lands and natural resources where they live, occupy or from which they have been displaced

People whose health, both mental and physical, makes them more vulnerable to the effects of climate change

Jobs that contribute to preserving or restoring the environment. We include jobs which require a high amount of green skills or which spend much of their time on green activities, as well as jobs transforming polluting industries.

woman and genders outside of the gender binary

Activities of industries that extract natural resources, such as mining, oil, and gas, for commercial use.

The activities of industries that transforms raw materials into finished goods through industrial processes.

The activities of industries involved in the production, distribution, and sale of energy, including electricity, gas, and renewables.

This sector involves managing waste treatment, sanitation, pollution control and environmental cleanup.

Activities that involve planning, designing and building infrastructure, residential, and commercial structures.

This sector involves the wholesale and retail selling of goods.

This sector involves activities to move goods and people, alongside the storage of products.

Activities that provide lodging, food, and entertainment services to guests, including hotels, restaurants, and resorts.

This sector creates and distributes information and entertainment through television, radio, print, and digital platforms.

This sector provides communication services, software development, and IT solutions.

This sector involves activities that impart knowledge and skills to individuals, including formal schooling, vocational training and educational support.

Activities of government agencies and institutions that provide public services, enforce laws and manage public resources.

This sector includes firms and individuals offering specialised expertise in fields such as law, accounting, consulting, science and engineering.

Activities that relate to the production of goods and services from forests.

Activities involving the catching, processing, and selling of fish for food, recreation, and industry.

This sector involves the distribution, treatment, and conservation of water resources.

Climate change can have a range of impacts on technological system. Extreme weather events can cause infrastructure failures like power outages or damage to roads and bridges, as well as the impacts from waste following natural disasters. Human activities also cause technological impacts, such as the risks posed by oil spillage and leaks.

Any substance with chemical properties that can cause physical harm to people or damage the environment, including ammonia, carbon monoxide, phosphine, chlorine, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, pesticides, dioxins, microplastics, benzene, asbestos, aflatoxins, fluoride, methanol, and toxins from marine sources.

Climate change impacts our society by disrupting the natural, economic and social systems we depend on. Physical hazards and underlying vulnerabilities can lead to increased resource competition for food and water, which can heighten the risk of conflict.

Slow onset events evolve gradually from incremental changes over many years or from increased frequency or intensity of recurring events. As defined in the Cancun Adaptation Framework (2010), slow onset events include risks and impacts from rising temperatures, desertification, biodiversity loss, land and forest degradation, glacial retreat, ocean acidification, sea level rise, and salinization.

Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC and Others v. Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy and Others - application

Policy instrument

Risk

Impacted group

Just transition

Renewable energy

Fossil fuel

Economic sector

Adaptation/resilience

Finance