On March 3, 2021, an Italian youth filed a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights against 32 countries. The applicant is an 18-year-old woman living in a small town in southern Italy (Matera) which is prone to floods. She claims to suffer from allergies (skin rash) and psychological distress due to global warming (states of anxiety caused by the inability to go out during the day and, more generally, by concerns about the future and the possibility of continuing to live there due to global warming), which is to be manifested in extraordinarily high temperatures in summer and severe flooding. She lives in a flood zone (Matera). 

Relying on Articles 2, 8, 13 and 14, she complains that the 32 States parties to the Convention which are also parties to the 2015 Paris Agreement (including Turkey, Switzerland, Portugal, Austria, Norway and France) have not taken sufficient measures to implement the latter. She complains about a violation: (i) of the positive obligations of States under Articles 2 and 8 to protect the environment; (ii) of Article 14, since the harmful effects of global warming would hit the younger generations harder; (iii) of Article 13, alleging that the domestic remedies would not be effective since she would be forced to lodge a complaint in the courts of 32 States, a burden which it would be impossible for her to bear because of her young age and limited financial resources. The case is similar to Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Other States. 

The case is brought against Member States of the EU (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Croatia, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden) as well as Norway, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. The complainant alleges that the respondents have fallen short of their human rights obligations by failing to agree to emissions reductions that will keep temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as envisioned by the Paris Agreement. 

The Court unanimously ruled the case inadmissible in its decision of 7 May 2025. Confirming its previously established case law from the Duarte Agostinho case, the Court held that the applicant was under Italy's territorial jurisdiction and that there was no basis to find that the other respondent states had exercised extraterritorial jurisdiction. It underlined that the applicant did not submit any specific arguments on the subject of extraterritorial jurisdiction. The complaint against all states other than Italy was therefore declared inadmissible based on lack of jurisdiction. 

With respect to the complaint against Italy, the Court reiterated the relevant principles on victim status in the climate-change context established in the Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz case, which had established a high threshold for victim status. As the applicant had not submitted any medical documentation, the Court could not conclude whether she was subject to a high intensity of exposure to the adverse effects of climate change or whether there had been a pressing need to ensure her individual protection from the harm which the effects of climate change may have had on the enjoyment of her human rights. Therefore, the applicant's complaint under Article 8 of the Convention was declared inadmissible as being incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention. Her complaint under Article 2 was declared inadmissible for the same reason due to a lack of substantiation. In relation to the applicant's other complaints, the Court held that these complaints either did not meet the admissibility criteria or did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

Uricchio v. Italy and 31 other States

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Uricchio v. Italy and 31 other States - decision

Filed

International

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Hot temperature extremes are daily maximum temperatures  that were exceeded on average once in a decade or once in 50 years, and includes heatwaves.

Extreme weather refers to events where a weather variable exceeds (or falls below) a threshold. Meaning it is significantly different from the average or usual weather pattern.

Slow onset events evolve gradually from incremental changes over many years or from increased frequency or intensity of recurring events. As defined in the Cancun Adaptation Framework (2010), slow onset events include risks and impacts from rising temperatures, desertification, biodiversity loss, land and forest degradation, glacial retreat, ocean acidification, sea level rise, and salinization.