Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Leon v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Leon v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 

2:25-cv-1190United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
10/28/2025
Motion to remand granted.
The federal district court for the Western District of Washington remanded a climate change-related wrongful death action to state court. The plaintiff seeks to hold manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of fossil fuels liable under product liability and public nuisance theories for her mother’s death during the Pacific Northwest heat dome event in 2021. The court rejected the defendants’ position that there was federal diversity jurisdiction because one of the defendants—a company that owned a pipeline—had been fraudulently joined. The court was satisfied that the pipeline owner was a citizen of Washington. The court further found that the defendants did not meet their “heavy burden” of demonstrating that the company could not be liable for violating Washington’s product liability and public nuisance statutes. The court also concluded that the defendants’ arguments regarding procedural misjoinder were without merit because they raised state law issues that did not implicate federal subject matter jurisdiction. The court denied the plaintiff’s request for fees and costs, finding that removal was not “objectively unreasonable.”
Decision
06/25/2025
Notice of removal filed.
Chevron Corporation and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Chevron) filed a notice of their removal to federal court of a wrongful death action filed by the daughter of a woman who died from hyperthermia in Seattle during the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat dome. All other fossil fuel industry defendants consented to the removal of the litigation. Chevron argued that there was diversity jurisdiction in federal district court because “the single purported Washington Defendant, Olympic Pipe Line Company LLC [(Olympic)], has been fraudulently joined and procedurally misjoined.” Chevron contended that “deception-based claims” could not be asserted against Olympic, which “merely transports fossil fuels—the company does not produce, let alone market to consumers, any fossil fuels,” and that even if a claim could be stated against Olympic, it would not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the claims against the other defendants.
Notice Of Removal

Leon v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 

25-2-15986-8 SEAState Courts, Washington Superior Court (Wash. Super. Ct.)6 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
02/03/2026
Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendants ConocoPhillips and ConocoPhillips Company.
Motion To Dismiss
02/03/2026
Joint motion to strike filed by defendants.
Motion
02/03/2026
Joint motion filed by defendants to dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint for failure to state a claim.
Motion To Dismiss
02/03/2026
Joint motion filed by out-of-state defendants to dismiss complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Motion To Dismiss