- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Appalachian Voices v. EPA
Appalachian Voices v. EPA
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
District court's dismissal order vacated and case remanded to district court.
Geography
Docket number
25-5333
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Air Act (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Inflation Reduction Act of 2022United States → Presentment ClauseUnited States → Separation of Powers Doctrine
At issue
Class action by grantees challenging the termination of the Inflation Reduction Act’s Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant program.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
07/21/2026
District court's dismissal order vacated and case remanded to district court.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court order dismissing a putative class action brought by grantees under the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA’s) Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant program to challenge the termination of all grants awarded under the program. The D.C. Circuit found that the district court erred by reaching the merits of the plaintiffs’ constitutional claims without first assessing the jurisdictional issue of whether the cases was mooted by Congress’s rescission of the “unobligated balances of amounts made available to carry out” the IRA provision establishing the Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant program. The D.C. Circuit vacated the dismissal order in full, including the district court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ Administrative Procedure Act claims because the Tucker Act precluded district court jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ “essentially” contractual claims. The D.C. Circuit concluded that since a decision on mootness could render review of the Tucker Act issue unnecessary, it was “appropriate to leave that issue for another day.” The D.C. Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings.
Decision
–
11/03/2025
Brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center as amicus curiae in support of appellants and reversal.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
Summary
Class action by grantees challenging the termination of the Inflation Reduction Act’s Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant program.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance