- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- California Cattlemen’s Association v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
California Cattlemen’s Association v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Geography
Docket number
1:17-cv-01536
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States → Regulatory Flexibility Act
At issue
Challenge to designation of critical habitat in California for three amphibian species.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
03/27/2019
Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the California Cattlemen’s Association and two other agricultural trade groups lacked standing to challenge the designation of critical habitat for three amphibian species listed under the Endangered Species Act. All three species live in California’s Sierra Nevada mountain range and are threatened by a number of factors, including changes associated with climate change. The district court found that the trade groups had not established that any of their members would suffer an injury traceable to the designation of critical habitat, as opposed to pre-existing requirements. In addition, the groups failed to show that a decision in their favor would redress the alleged injuries.
Decision
–
05/29/2018
Government's motion to dismiss denied without prejudice and defendant-intervenor's motion to dismiss granted as to the 5 U.S.C. 603 claim but otherwise denied without prejudice.
Decision
–
03/19/2018
Opposition filed to motions to dismiss.
Opposition
–
02/27/2018
Motion to dismiss filed by defendant-intervenors.
Motion To Dismiss
–
02/06/2018
Motion to intervene granted.
Decision
–
12/15/2017
Motion to intervene filed by environmental groups.
Center for Biological Diversity and two other organizations moved to intervene in the lawsuit challenging the designation of critical habitat for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog, the northern distinct population segment of the mountain yellow-legged frog, and the Yosemite toad, all three of which are amphibian species living at high elevations in the Sierra Nevada that are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The organizations noted that all three species were threatened by climate change, among other threats.
Motion To Intervene
–
11/22/2017
Motion to dismiss filed by federal defendants.
Motion To Dismiss
–
07/31/2017
Complaint
–
Summary
Challenge to designation of critical habitat in California for three amphibian species.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance