Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Complaint filed.
Docket number
4:23-cv-00287
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United StatesEndangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s alleged failures to issue final rules on petitions to list a number of species and take other actions under the Endangered Species Act.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
06/22/2023
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed an Endangered Species Act citizen suit in federal court in Arizona challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s alleged failures to issue final rules on petitions to list a number of species, to issue a timely 12-month finding on one species, and to finalize critical habitat protection for another species. Species that are the subjects of the lawsuit include the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl (which CBD alleged is threatened by droughts driven by climate change); the Peñasco least chipmunk (which allegedly is threatened by climate change events such as drought and wildfires); six species of freshwater mussels threatened by climate change; the Mt. Rainer white-tailed ptarmigan (a bird adapted to frigid climates and whose alpine habitat is shrinking due to climate change); distinct population segments (DPSs) of the foothill yellow-legged frog (for which the complaint cited climate change as one threat); the tall western penstemon (a flower threatened by climate change); and the Pacific Marten coastal DPS (a carnivore of the weasel family whose habitat has been lost and fragmented due to logging and wildfires).
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s alleged failures to issue final rules on petitions to list a number of species and take other actions under the Endangered Species Act.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance