- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- North Dakota
- /
- Continental Resources, Inc. v. de la Vega
Continental Resources, Inc. v. de la Vega
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Notice to dismiss adopted by court.
Geography
Docket number
1:21-cv-00034
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of North Dakota (D.N.D.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Mineral Leasing Act (MLA)
At issue
Oil and gas exploration and production company's lawsuit to compel the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to act on applications for permit to drill.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
03/10/2021
Notice to dismiss adopted by court.
Decision
–
03/09/2021
Notice of dismissal of complaint filed.
The federal district court for the District of North Dakota dismissed without prejudice a lawsuit brought by an oil and gas exploration and production company in February 2021 to compel the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to act on applications for permit to drill (APDs) submitted in 2020 for oil and gas leases in North Dakota. The company submitted a notice of voluntary dismissal after BLM granted the APDs in February and March 2021.
Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal
–
02/23/2021
Complaint filed.
An oil and gas exploration and production company operating oil and gas leases in North Dakota filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of North Dakota to compel the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to act on applications for permit to drill (APDs) submitted in 2020. The company alleged that BLM would have approved the APDs but for Secretarial Order 3395 signed by the Acting Secretary of the Interior on January 20, 2021, which withdrew authority from BLM to approve the APDs and placed the authority in the hands of new presidential appointees. The company asserted that by failing to approve the APDs, the defendants had failed to meet non-discretionary obligations under the Mineral Leasing Act.
Complaint
–
Summary
Oil and gas exploration and production company's lawsuit to compel the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to act on applications for permit to drill.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance