- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Dakota Rural Action v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Dakota Rural Action v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2018
Status
CAFO provisions of final rule vacated.
Geography
Docket number
1:18-cv-02852
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) rule that categorically excluded FSA funding of medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations from NEPA review.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
04/04/2023
CAFO provisions of final rule vacated.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia vacated provisions of a Farm Service Agency (FSA) 2016 final rule that established a categorical exemption from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for loan actions to medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Medium-sized CAFOs stable or confine 200 to 699 mature dairy cows, 300 to 999 veal calves, 300 to 999 cattle, or 37,500 to 124,999 chickens. The court found that FSA had not provided notice that it would exempt all such loan actions from any NEPA review, had provided no opportunity for public comment on this change, and had provided “essentially no reasoning” for the change. The plaintiffs’ allegations included that CAFOs are one of the largest sources of air pollution in the U.S. and that “CAFOs and CAFO waste disposal also release the powerful greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide,” contributing to climate change.
Decision
–
11/07/2019
Defendants replied in support of their motion for remand without vacatur and opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Reply
–
10/17/2019
Plaintiffs filed opposition to motion for remand without vacatur and a cross-motion for summary judgment.
Opposition
–
09/19/2019
Motion for voluntary remand filed by federal defendants.
Motion
–
07/31/2019
Joint status report filed.
Status Report
–
05/22/2019
Amended complaint filed.
Complaint
–
05/22/2019
Amended complaint filed.
Complaint
–
05/20/2019
Unopposed motion for leave to file amended complaint filed by plaintiffs.
Motion
–
04/01/2019
Court sustained defendants' objection to plaintiffs' notice of related case.
Decision
–
03/25/2019
Reply filed by plaintiffs in support of notice of related case.
Reply
–
03/15/2019
Answer filed by federal defendants.
Answer
–
03/15/2019
Objection to plaintiffs' notice of related case filed by defendants.
Objections
–
12/05/2018
Notice of related case filed by plaintiffs.
Notice
–
12/05/2018
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) rule that categorically excluded FSA funding of medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations from NEPA review.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance