Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Decision T-218/17 of April 19, 2017

Geography
Year
2015
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2015
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
ColombiaConstitutional Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Failure to adapt (Global)Suits against governments (Global)Human Rights (Global)
Principal law
ColombiaConstitution of ColombiaColombiaLaw on Public Utilities for Households (Law 142 of 1994)International LawInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
At issue
Whether the lack of access to drinking water as a result of a decrease in natural water reservoirs due to climate change and the lack of adequate infrastructure by the Colombian government violated human rights.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results

Summary

Inhabitants of San Anterito, a small Colombian town, filed a “tutela” (amparo mechanism) against municipal and state authorities and water service providers for failing to provide adequate water supply infrastructure. Plaintiffs alleged violation of their fundamental rights to life, water, dignity, and human and environmental health. Specifically, plaintiffs argued that, due to climate change and population increase, natural water reservoirs had dried out and that the government had the obligation to provide basic services, including water. The Court found that claimants had a legitimate interest in demanding the government’s protection of their fundamental and human rights, especially the right to water and the right to have an adequate water supply. The Court ordered the Colombian government to ensure adequate enjoyment of the rights to water, life, dignity, and human and environmental health for San Anterito’s inhabitants. The Court said that the State’s duties were intensified by the decrease in natural water reservoirs due to climate change, among other causes. However, before the decision was made, the local government started to provide water to the town’s inhabitants. As a result, the Court declared the issue resolved, but emphasized the importance of the adopted measures in protecting the town’s fundamental rights.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance