Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

District Court Mönchengladbach-Rheydt, Urt. v. 14.3.2022 – 21 Cs – 721 Js 44/22 – 69/22

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
GermanyNorth Rhine-Westphalia
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Protesters (Global)
Principal law
GermanyConstitution of GermanyGermanyCriminal Code
At issue
Whether climate protests can be covered by fundamental rights protection.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Summary

In March 2022, the District Court of Mönchengladbach-Rheydt (federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia) acquitted the defendant who had been charged with trespassing when protesting on the site of a lignite mine. While the District Court found that the entering of the site fulfilled the elements of the crime under Section 123 (1) of the German Criminal Code, it was neither “unlawful” nor “without authority”, as the defendant exercised his fundamental rights under Art. 8(1) – freedom of assembly; Art. 5 (1)(1) – freedom of expression and Art. 4(3) – freedom of conscience of the Basic Law. The District Court held that climate change was an issue of ‘paramount importance’. The political decision to cease lignite mining – an activity recognised as harmful – and the subsequent decision to delay its phase-out nonetheless, could, in the words of the Court, place individuals in a state of moral dilemma, wishing to protest against it. It follows, that protests against climate-damaging measures can be covered by freedom of conscience.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance