Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Earth Island Institute v. Nash

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Motion for temporary restraining order denied and case transferred to Eastern District of California.
Docket number
3:19-cv-05792
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesDisaster Relief Appropriations Act of 2013United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to federal and state authorizations for a logging project and biomass power plant on public forestland burned during the Rim Fire in 2013.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
10/07/2019
Motion for temporary restraining order denied and case transferred to Eastern District of California.
Decision
10/01/2019
Response-reply filed in opposition to motion to dismiss/change venue and in support of plaintiffs' motion for TRO and preliminary injunction.
Reply
09/27/2019
Response filed by federal defendants in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
Response
09/27/2019
Opposition filed by defendant California Department of Housing and Community Development to motion for TRO and preliminary injunction.
Opposition
09/24/2019
Memorandum filed in support of plaintiffs' ex parte motion for TRO and preliminary injunction.
Motion
09/23/2019
Motion filed by federal defendants to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer to the Eastern District of California.
Motion To Dismiss
09/16/2019
Complaint filed.
Earth Island Institute, Sequoia Forestkeeper, Greenpeace, and climate scientist James Hansen filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of California challenging federal and state authorizations for a logging project and biomass power plant on public forestland burned during the Rim Fire in 2013. The complaint alleged that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) improperly used disaster relief funds for logging activities and that HUD, HCD, and U.S. Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act. The plaintiffs contended that environmental impact statements (EISs) from 2014 and 2016 should have been supplemented with new information about the forest’s natural regeneration and that the biomass plant should have been considered in the same EISs as the logging project. The complaint’s allegations included that the EISs failed to analyze the environmental impacts of logging for biomass energy production, including increased greenhouse gas emissions, and that the climate and greenhouse gas effects of logging would be different than what was studied in the EISs due to differences in logging “post-fire large, dead trees” for lumber and removing and burning “trees of all sizes, both live and dead, and including the young, naturally-regenerating forest, for biomass energy production.” The plaintiffs later filed a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. The federal defendants filed to dismiss the case for improper venue or to transfer the case to the Eastern District of California.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to federal and state authorizations for a logging project and biomass power plant on public forestland burned during the Rim Fire in 2013.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance