- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United Kingdom
- /
- High Court challenge to Luton Airport expansion
High Court challenge to Luton Airport expansion
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Pending
Geography
Court/admin entity
United Kingdom → England and Wales → High Court of Justice
Case category
Suits against governments → Environmental assessment and permitting → Other projects
Principal law
United Kingdom → Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000United Kingdom → Town and County Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017United Kingdom → Climate Change Act 2008United Kingdom → Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (England and Wales)
At issue
Whether permission should have been granted for Luton Airport Expansion.
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Search results
11/08/2025
From LADACAN website.
Press Release
–
11/03/2025
Online news article
Press Release
–
Summary
Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise (“LADACAN”), an unincorporated association constituted to oppose the expansion of Luton Airport, brought a judicial review against the Secretary of State's decision to grant development consent to the expansion of London Luton Airport. This decision was taken in spite of the recommendation of planning inspectors that permission should not be granted.
The following grounds of challenge will be considered in the High Court:
1. There was an error in law in that greenhouse gas emissions from inbound flights were excluded from the environmental impact assessment (EIA).
2. There was a lack of consistency in approach between the Luton Airport decision and the process for approving Gatwick Airport’s expansion.
3. There was an error of law in that the likely significant impacts of non-carbon dioxide emissions were excluded from the environmental impact assessment.
4. There was an error of law in concluding that the government’s duty under the Climate Change Act 2008 to adopt policies and procedures to help reach net zero was a ‘pollution control regime’.
5. There was a failure to comply with duties under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, which require that developments in an area of outstanding national beauty must seek to further the conservation and natural beauty of the area.