Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation

Geography
Year
2005
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2005
Status
Per curiam opinion issued.
Docket number
14-30060, 14-30136
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US)Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdmiralty LawUnited StatesFederal Tort Claims ActUnited StatesFlood Control Act of 1928
At issue
Action seeking damages from Army Corps of Engineers for exacerbation of flooding damage during and after Hurricane Katrina.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
05/28/2015
Per curiam opinion issued.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of claims against the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the United States in which homeowners sought damages under three admiralty statutes for the exacerbation of Hurricane Katrina’s effects in the New Orleans area. The court held in an unpublished opinion that the Corps’ decision on its method of dredging the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet channel was shielded from liability by the discretionary function exemption. The court rejected the homeowners’ contention that the dredging method used by the Corps for decades caused wetland erosion in violation of federal and state statutes and regulations that specifically prescribed that the Corps use methods that would protect wetlands.
Decision

Summary

Action seeking damages from Army Corps of Engineers for exacerbation of flooding damage during and after Hurricane Katrina.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Risk
Adaptation/resilience
Finance