Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Maaloo v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

Geography
🇳🇿 New Zealand
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2024
Status
Decided
Geography
🇳🇿 New Zealand
Court/admin entity
New Zealand → Immigration and Protection Tribunal
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Human Rights (Global) → Climate migration (Global)
Principal law
New Zealand → Immigration Act 1987New Zealand → Immigration Act 2009
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.

Summary

This was a humanitarian appeal by the appellants, a married couple from Tuvalu. The primary issue on appeal is whether, in circumstances when the appellants have lived in New Zealand for over 23 years, have numerous family members—including two New Zealand-citizen children—in New Zealand, and have no employment or home remaining in Tuvalu, there are exceptional humanitarian circumstances which would make it unjust or unduly harsh for them to be required to leave New Zealand.

Tribunal member Clayton, on December 10, 2024, held that such circumstances exist and therefore ordered to grant resident visas to appellants. In reaching the conclusion, the Tribunal has addressed "the general conditions in Tavalu" as with recognizable impacts of climate change, citing Re Limoni and BM (Tuvalu) v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. The court also acknowledged the psychosocial impacts of exposure to hazards, particularly slow-onset hazards such as climate change, relying on the same cases.

 Topics mentioned most in this case

See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.

Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance