- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- South Africa
- /
- Philippi Horticultural Area Food & Farming Campaign, et al. v. MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Western Cape, et al.
Philippi Horticultural Area Food & Farming Campaign, et al. v. MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Western Cape, et al.
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Decided
Geography
Court/admin entity
South Africa → High Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global) → Climate adaptation (Global)
Principal law
South Africa → Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000
At issue
Petitioners challenged administrative decision allowing urban development.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
Summary
The South African High Court has remanded an administrative decision allowing urban development with instructions to more fully consider climate change impacts.
Since May 2011, the Province and City of Cape Town have taken steps to allow urban development in the Philippi Horticultural Area (PHA). The PHA Food and Farming Campaign and its convener, Nazeer Ahmed Sonday, challenged those actions on several grounds, including that development would threaten a local aquifer. On February 18, 2020 a judge of the South African High Court found that the Province and City had made several errors and remanded with instructions to, among other things, reconsider the decision's effect on existing rights related to the aquifer "in the context of climate change and water scarcity."
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance