Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Public Watchdogs v. Southern California Edison Co.

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
First amended complaint dismissed with prejudice and motion for preliminary injunction denied.
Docket number
3:19-cv-01635
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States District Court for the Southern District of California (S.D. Cal.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US)Actions seeking adaptation measures (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesState Law–Strict LiabilityUnited StatesState Law—Nuisance
At issue
Challenge to decommissioning plan for nuclear generating station in California based in part on climate change risks.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
12/03/2019
First amended complaint dismissed with prejudice and motion for preliminary injunction denied.
Decision
08/30/2019
Plaintiffs filed amended motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.
Motion
08/29/2019
Complaint filed.
A nonprofit group filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of California to block implementation of the decommissioning plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) in California. The defendants are the utilities that own SONGS, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the manufacturer of canisters used for storage of spent nuclear fuel. The complaint asserted that the NRC’s approval of the plan violated the Administrative Procedure Act and that the plan constituted a public nuisance. The complaint also asserted a strict products liability claim against the canister manufacturer. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were “risking the lives of millions of California residents and the prospect of irreparable harm to the environment by removing spent nuclear fuel from a storage location specifically designed and used for that purpose for decades,” transporting it into defective canisters, and “dropping it into holes a mere 108 feet from one of California’s most populated public beaches, within a tsunami zone, surrounded by active fault lines.” Among the risks alleged in the complaint were that if sea levels rise at the rate projected by climate change experts, the results could be “catastrophic.”
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to decommissioning plan for nuclear generating station in California based in part on climate change risks.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance