Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Take Down Macron Protester Cases

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
FranceCourt of Appeal of BordeauxFranceCourt of Appeal of ColmarFranceCourt of Appeal of LyonFranceCriminal Court of AuchFranceCriminal Court of BonnevilleFranceCriminal Court of LyonFranceCriminal Court of ParisFranceCriminal Court of Strasbourg
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Protesters (Global)
Principal law
FranceCriminal Code
At issue
Climate activists defend against theft and refusal to identify charges by claiming civil disobedience was necessary to bring attention to France's failure to meet its climate targets
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
09/22/2021
Cour de cassation final judgment
Decision
12/03/2020
Appeal decision acquitting defendants in Strasbourg case
Appeal
10/27/2020
Original judgment in Auch (five defendants)
Decision
09/16/2020
Prosecutor's appeal in Bordeaux case (eight defendants)
Appeal
01/14/2020
Prosecutor's appeal of Lyon judgment
Appeal
12/05/2019
Original Judgment in Bonneville (seven defendants)
Decision
10/16/2019
Original Judgment in Paris (nine defendants)
Decision
09/16/2019
Original judgment in Lyon (two defendants)
Decision
09/16/2019
Unofficial English Translation of Lyon Judgment
Decision
06/26/2019
Original judgment in Strasbourg (three defendants)
Decision

Summary

In more than 35 trials, climate protestors across France have defended against theft and refusal to provide DNA charges stemming from their activities as part of the "Take Down Macron" movement. Defendants argued that they had stolen or attempted to steal portraits of the French President, Emmanuel Macron, in official city and government buildings out of necessity to call attention to France's failure to meet its climate targets. Judgments in the trials ranged from acquittals to fines of hundreds of Euros. Cour d'appel Lyon 4ème chambre overturned the trial court judgment on January, 14, 2020. Several of the judgments were appealed, with at least three cases reaching their final conclusion as of December 2020. Documents from six of the cases are available below. More documents will be added as they become available. In one of the trials, in Lyon, two defendants were charged with fraudulently removing the portraits from a town hall in Lyon in February 2019. The prosecutor sought to impose a fine of 500 euros on each defendant. The court heard testimony from a former government minister that France has not complied with the Paris Agreement due to a lack of political will, and that only the president can order the action required by the present situation. An ecologist also testified about the necessity for rapid change in order to limit temperature rise. The defendants argued that the use of legal channels and warnings from scientific experts had not provided sufficient leverage, and they believed that acts of nonviolent civil disobedience were required to raise awareness of the need for policy change. The court agreed, finding that climate change seriously affects the future of humanity by provoking natural disasters, leading to violent conflicts, and threatening flora and fauna; and that although France is committed to certain measures to address climate change, the defense's submissions showed that the government's objectives will not be achieved. The court concluded that, under these circumstances, citizens' means of expression could not be limited to voting, and that the defendants' theft of the portrait was a necessary substitute for impossible dialogue between the government and the people. The court accordingly acquitted both defendants. The prosecutor appealed the judgment, and the appeal hearing was set for December 19, 2020. The Court of Appeals in Bordeaux sentenced 8 activists with 600 euro fines. This decision was overturned by the Court of Cessation which argued that the criminalization of these actions might interfere with the defendants' freedom of expression. The activists were retried in a court in Tolouse in February 2022. In April 2022, the activists were released. The case is now closed.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance