Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

United States v. Vermont

Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Reply filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for summary judgment and in opposition to cross-motions for summary judgment.
Docket number
2:25-cv-00463
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District of Vermont (D. Vt.)
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsFourteenth AmendmentConstitutional ClaimsOther Constitutional Claims
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)United StatesCommerce ClauseUnited StatesForeign Affairs DoctrineUnited StatesForeign Commerce ClauseUnited StatesFourteenth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited StatesSupremacy Clause
At issue
Action brought by the United States asserting that Vermont's Climate Superfund Act is unconstitutional and unenforceable.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
12/15/2025
Reply filed by plaintiffs in support of motion for summary judgment and in opposition to cross-motions for summary judgment.
Reply
11/24/2025
Brief filed by Vermont Public Interest Research Group as amicus curiae in support of defendants.
Amicus Motion/Brief
11/21/2025
Intervenor-defendants filed memorandum of law filed in support of motion for summary judgment and in opposition to plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment and reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss.
Brief
11/21/2025
Motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae filed by Vermont Public Interest Research Group.
Amicus Motion/Brief
11/17/2025
Defendants filed consolidated memorandum of law in reply in support of motion to dismiss, in opposition to plaintiffs' and intervenor-plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment, and in support of defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment.
Brief
09/15/2025
United States and EPA filed consolidated response in opposition to motions to dismiss and memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
08/26/2025
Brief filed by economists Joseph E. Stiglitz et al. as amici curiae.
Amicus Motion/Brief
08/22/2025
Memorandum of law filed in support of intervenor-defendants' motion to dismiss.
Motion To Dismiss
08/15/2025
Memorandum of law filed in support of defendants' motion to dismiss.
Motion To Dismiss
08/08/2025
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and Conservation Law Foundation's motion to intervene granted.
Decision
07/29/2025
Reply memorandum filed by Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and Conservation Law Foundation in support of motion to intervene.
Reply
07/23/2025
Response filed by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to intervene.
Opposition
07/09/2025
Motion to intervene filed by Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and Conservation Law Foundation.
Motion To Intervene
06/25/2025
Stipulated motion filed to set briefing schedule.
The parties proposed a briefing schedule that would coordinate the briefing for this case with the <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-moore/">case</a> filed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Petroleum Institute.
Motion
05/01/2025
Complaint filed.
On May 1, 2025, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit against the State of Vermont asserting that the State's climate Superfund law is unconstitutional and unenforceable. The complaint alleged that the law, which the State enacted in 2024, is a “transparent monetary-extraction scheme” to force out-of-state fossil fuel companies to fund climate change adaptation projects within the state. The complaint alleged that the law attempts “to usurp the power of the federal government by regulating national and global emissions of greenhouse gases, violating federal law in multiple ways.” The United States alleged that the climate Superfund law is preempted by the Clean Air Act and foreign affairs doctrine, that it violates the limits on extraterritorial legislation imposed by the Constitution’s structure and due process principles, and that the law violates the Foreign and Interstate Commerce Clauses. The United States asked the court to declare the law unconstitutional and unenforceable and to enjoin the State defendants from taking actions to implement or enforce the law. The United States filed a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/united-states-v-new-york/">similar lawsuit</a> challenging New York's climate Superfund law. There also is a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-moore/">pending case</a> in which the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and American Petroleum Institute challenge the Vermont law.
Complaint

Summary

Action brought by the United States asserting that Vermont's Climate Superfund Act is unconstitutional and unenforceable.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Climate finance
Adaptation/resilience