- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Von Oeyen v. Southern California Edison Co.
Von Oeyen v. Southern California Edison Co.
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
19STCV04409
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)
Principal law
United States → California Public Utilities CodeUnited States → Inverse CondemnationUnited States → Premises LiabilityUnited States → State Law–Strict LiabilityUnited States → State Law—NegligenceUnited States → State Law—NuisanceUnited States → State Law—Trespass
At issue
Lawsuit seeking damages from utility and owner of former rocket engine test and nuclear research facility in connection with destruction of homes and other property by the Woolsey Fire in Malibu.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
02/08/2019
Complaint filed.
In a lawsuit seeking damages and other relief in connection with the Woolsey Fire, Malibu residents mentioned climate risk as one known factor of which the defendants—the utility Southern California Edison Company, its parent company, and the Boeing Company (Boeing)—were aware and to which the defendants failed to respond in their maintenance and operation of their equipment and property. The Woolsey Fire was ignited in November 2018 in the area of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory site owned by Boeing, which the plaintiffs alleged was a former rocket engine test and nuclear research facility and “currently the focus of a comprehensive environmental investigation and cleanup program.” The plaintiffs asserted that the utility defendants had a non-delegable duty to safely maintain their electrical equipment, and that Boeing had a non-delegable duty to keep its property reasonably safe, and that all defendants were aware of the high risk of wildfire and knew that their equipment or property was not properly maintained or safe. The complaint asserted claims of negligence, inverse condemnation, public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, premises liability, and violations of the California Public Utilities Code and Health and Safety Code.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit seeking damages from utility and owner of former rocket engine test and nuclear research facility in connection with destruction of homes and other property by the Woolsey Fire in Malibu.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance