Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

West Virginia v. James

Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Answer filed by amended complaint.
Docket number
1:25-cv-00168
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsN.D.N.Y.
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsCommerce ClauseConstitutional ClaimsFourteenth AmendmentConstitutional ClaimsOther Constitutional Claims
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)United StatesCommerce ClauseUnited StatesEighth AmendmentUnited StatesFifth Amendment—TakingsUnited StatesForeign Commerce ClauseUnited StatesFourteenth Amendment—Equal ProtectionUnited StatesSupremacy Clause
At issue
Challenge to the constitutionality of the New York's Climate Change Superfund Act.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
05/19/2025
Answer filed by amended complaint.
Answer
04/07/2025
Amended complaint filed.
Complaint
03/17/2025
Answer
02/06/2025
Complaint filed.
West Virginia and 21 other states, along with several coal, oil, and gas trade associations and a mining company, filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of New York challenging New York State’s Climate Change Superfund Act. The 2024 law established a $75 billion Climate Change Adaptation Cost Recovery Program to fund adaptation projects in the state. The program is to be funded by companies that engaged in fossil fuel extraction or crude oil refining during a covered period and that are responsible for more than one billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions during that period. The complaint alleged that the law was preempted under the U.S. Constitution because it “invades the equal sovereignty of other States by unconstitutionally imposing liability and penalties on energy companies outside of New York for greenhouse gas emissions produced by lawful activities outside of New York’s borders.” The plaintiffs also alleged that the New York law undermined federalism principles by inserting state law where there are “[u]niquely federal interests.” The complaint also asserted that the law was preempted under the Clean Air Act and violated the dormant Commerce Clause and the foreign Commerce Clause. In addition, plaintiffs claimed that the law was retroactive in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effected a regulatory taking under the U.S. and New York constitutions, and violated the Due Process Clause of the New York Constitution and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to the constitutionality of the New York's Climate Change Superfund Act.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Climate finance
Public finance actor