Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise (“LADACAN”), an unincorporated association constituted to oppose the expansion of Luton Airport, brought a judicial review against the Secretary of State’s decision to grant development consent to the expansion of London Luton Airport. This decision was taken in spite of the recommendation of planning inspectors that permission should not be granted. 

The following grounds of challenge was considered in the High Court: 
Ground 1. There was an error in law in that greenhouse gas emissions from inbound flights were excluded from the environmental impact assessment (EIA), contrary to the decision in Finch. The UK carbon budgets calculated emissions for outbound flights only.
Ground 2. There was a lack of consistency in approach between the Luton Airport decision and the process for approving Gatwick Airport’s expansion, specifically that inbound flight emissions had been considered in relation to Gatwick Airport’s expansion.
Ground 3. There was an error of law in that the likely significant impacts of non-carbon dioxide emissions were excluded from the environmental impact assessment, contrary to the decision in Finch.
Ground 4. There was an error of law in concluding that the government’s duty under the Climate Change Act 2008 to adopt policies and procedures to help reach net zero was a ‘pollution control regime.’
Ground 5. There was a failure to comply with duties under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, which require that developments in an area of outstanding national beauty must seek to further the conservation and natural beauty of the area.

On December 8, 2025, Justice Lang of the High Court dismissed the claim. Regarding ground 1, the Court found that it was open to the Secretary of State to use national carbon budgets to assess GHG emissions. It was also lawful for the Secretary of State not to assess emissions from inbound flights as it was lawful for them to conclude that they were not capable of meaningful assessment against UK carbon budgets. Regarding ground 2, the court found that the Gatwick Airport report related to a “different examination for a different project at a different airport”. Regarding ground 3, the Court found that non-carbon dioxide emissions had been taken into account, but “on a qualitative and high-level basis because of significant scientific uncertainty about the scale of their effects, and the lack of any relevant benchmark against which to contextualise their effect”. There was no legal obligation to embark upon an attempt to quantify such non-CO 2  emissions which were only indicative. In fact, “the nature and extent of the assessment was a matter for the decision-maker to decide”. Regarding ground 4, the Court found that analysis in a case not supported by the claimants (Bristol Airport Action Network Co-ordinating Committee) v SSLUHC [2023] PTSR 853) was the correct case to reference, and that the decision therein had not changed as a result of Finch. The Court also disagreed on ground 5.

High Court challenge to Luton Airport expansion

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

High Court challenge to Luton Airport expansion - press release

Filed

United Kingdom

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

Actions to reduce emissions in energy generation and supply.

This sector involves activities to move goods and people, alongside the storage of products.

Activities that provide lodging, food, and entertainment services to guests, including hotels, restaurants, and resorts.

High Court challenge to Luton Airport expansion - press release

Renewable energy

Economic sector

Finance