On February 28, 2025, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) filed a public civil action (ACP) against the Federal Union, arguing that the federal entity is failing to allocate a portion of the revenue from fines for environmental infractions and crimes to the National Fund for Public Calamities, Protection and Civil Defense (FUNCAP), in violation of Law No. 12,340/2010. It was argued that this omission compromises the socio-environmental recovery of the areas affected by the collapses of the Fundão and Córrego do Feijão dams, as well as the implementation of public policies for disaster prevention and mitigation. Plaintiffs requested: (i) the granting of urgent relief to order the Union to remedy the omission in allocating resources to FUNCAP; (ii) the condemnation of the Union to the obligation to promote the regular allocation of a portion of the environmental fines to the aforementioned fund; (iii) the allocation of these resources to the recovery of affected soils, to support family farming and to the adoption of measures aimed at reducing the physical and social vulnerabilities of the affected communities.

The Union filed a response, alleging preliminarily that the initial petition was defective due to the lack of indication of the value of the case. On the merits, it argued that the allocation of environmental fines to FUNCAP is not an automatic legal obligation, stating that the definition of these resources depends on budgetary legislation and administrative and legislative discretion, for which reason it requested that the claims be dismissed.

On May 12, 2026, Judge Marcelo Aguiar Machado of the Minas Gerais Federal Court dismissed the MPF’s claims. It determined that the allocation of resources to FUNCAP falls within the budgetary discretion of the Executive and Legislative branches, and there is no basis for the Judiciary to impose the desired allocation.

On June 30, 2026, the MPF filed an appeal, arguing that the ruling confused discretion regarding the amount of resources with the legal duty to ensure the functioning of FUNCAP. It argued that the Federal Government has an obligation to allocate a reasonable portion of environmental fines to the fund in future budget laws and to regulate its operation. Furthermore, it expressly framed the controversy within the context of climate change, arguing that strengthening FUNCAP is essential to finance policies for prevention, adaptation, risk management, and response to extreme events, the frequency and intensity of which are being exacerbated by climate change. Plaintiff highlighted that, according to the terms defined by the Supreme Federal Court in PSB et al. v. Brazil (ADPF 708/DF), the international commitments to which Brazil is a signatory and which provide for the protection of an ecologically balanced environment are of paramount importance to the realization of human rights, which is why they are characterized as supralegal norms. Plaintiff further emphasized the understanding of the Supreme Court, recognizing the unconstitutional omission of the Federal Government in failing to allocate resources in the Budget Laws (LOAs) for the composition of the Climate Fund and the Amazon Fund. Plaintiff stressed that with regard to FUNCAP, the unconstitutional omission is even more serious than that relating to ADPF 708/DF because, while in relation to FUNCAP there was omission by both the Executive and Legislative branches, in the cases of the Climate Fund and the Amazon Fund, the Legislative branch exercised its powers to ensure the effectiveness of the environmental funds, with omission only on the part of the Executive branch. Finally, the MPF requested the complete reversal of the judgment and the granting of urgent appellate relief, ordering the Federal Government to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that future budget laws guarantee a reasonable portion of the financial resources derived from environmental fines for the composition of FUNCAP (Fund for the Control of Environmental Risks), in order to make the operation of FUNCAP fully viable for the implementation of public policies for risk management and disaster response, including in the context of the collapses of the Fundão and Córrego do Feijão dams. The MPF also requested that the Federal Government be compelled to implement the regulations stipulated in Law 12.340/2010, reducing its discretion in the management and transfer of financial resources that should comprise FUNCAP.

Ministério Público Federal vs. União Federal (FUNCAP and environmental fines)

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Ministério Público Federal vs. União Federal (FUNCAP and environmental fines) - decision

Filed

Brazil

Minas Gerais

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

Social inclusion is the process of improving the terms on which individuals and groups take part in society—improving the ability, opportunity, and dignity of those disadvantaged on the basis of their identity.

Households employing domestic workers, for activities like cooking, cleaning and subsistence farming, for their own use.

This sector involves managing waste treatment, sanitation, pollution control and environmental cleanup.

Activities of businesses and institutions that provide financial services and products to individuals and organisations.

Activities that involve the cultivation of crops and raising of livestock for food, fibre, and other products essential for human life and industry.

Ministério Público Federal vs. União Federal (FUNCAP and environmental fines) - decision

Just transition

Economic sector

Finance