Wai 3325 is a kaupapa priority inquiry of the Waitangi Tribunal, looking into whether the Crown’s response to climate change is consistent with the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi. The Tribunal can provide non-binding recommendations to the New Zealand Government. 

The inquiry is focused on four overarching issues:
(1) What are the physical, spiritual, cultural, social, health, and economic impacts of climate change on Māori? This includes current and future impacts. 
(2) What relevant Tiriti/Treaty principles should the Crown consider when addressing the impacts of climate change on Māori? 
(3) Has the Crown’s conduct (including actions and omissions) in response to climate change been consistent with Tiriti/Treaty principles? 
(4) What recommendations should the Tribunal make in terms of how the Crown should conduct itself consistently with Tiriti/Treaty principles when forming future climate change policies? 

Claims include alleged breaches of Te Tiriti/the Treaty relating to a wide range of climate policy and decisions, including forestry, adaptation, and New Zealand’s emissions trading scheme. A broad cross-section of Māori interests are involved, including whānau, hapū, iwi, business, and advocacy groups.

<Wai 2607>
On 1 June 2016, the Waitangi Tribunal received an application from Cletus Maanu Paul, David Potter, and Andrew Peterson on behalf of the Mataatua District Maori Council (MDMC) alleging that the Crown is acting in breach of Treaty obligations towards Maori because the New Zealand Government was failing to implement adequate policies to address the threats posed by global climate change. The claim alleged that the Crown has continued to breach its obligations of active protection under Te Tiriti o Waitangi towards Māori by failing to put in place policies that would satisfy New Zealand’s obligations under the Paris Agreement, and that the steps the Crown had taken, such as establishing an emissions trading scheme, were ineffective and insufficient. 

The claim was declined on the basis that the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) policies and targets were subject to ongoing processes in which Māori would continue to have a role, and the Crown was still developing its domestic policies on climate matters. The application was dismissed. 

In 2019, the Wai 2607 applicants applied to have their claim heard as a priority on the basis that there would be a significant delay in hearing the claim, which would cause irreversible prejudice to Māori, as the Natural Resources and Environmental Management kaupapa inquiry was grouped eleventh in priority for hearing. At that time, the former Chairperson noted that the Tribunal was barred from inquiring into the matters as the matters raised in the statement of claim were the subject of the Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Reform) Amendment Bill, which was currently before the House. 

Renewed request for a prioritised inquiry within the kaupapa inquiry programme - Wai 2607
In February 2023, the Waitangi Tribunal received a renewed application for priority by the Wai 2607 applicant in relation to the Crown’s past and present climate change policies and the ETS. 

The Wai 2607 applicants contended that the criteria for priority had been satisfied, as climate change is increasingly impacting Māori and all of Aotearoa, as demonstrated by recent extreme storms and flooding that had impacted large parts of Aotearoa New Zealand. Further, climate change continues to have an impact on Māori businesses, including agricultural, horticultural and fisheries industries. 

<Urgent Inquiry Application - Wai 3262>
On 13 March 2023, the Tribunal received a statement of claim for an urgent hearing by Emily Bailey on behalf of Climate Justice Taranaki (Wai 3262). The applicant submitted that climate change presents an emergency for Māori communities, which are disproportionately affected by climate change, and alleged that the Crown’s actions to address climate change through general policies, the Climate Change Response Act 2002 and the ETS are likely to cause significant prejudice to Māori. 

The Tribunal found that the Wai 3262 application did not, at that stage, meet the requirements for granting an urgent inquiry. However, the Tribunal granted a kaupapa inquiry into climate change policy, in light of climate change being an existential threat not only to the claimants but to Māori and the nation. For more on the case, please refer to "Wai 3262: Climate Justic Taranaki v New Zealand."

<Decision on claim progressing - Wai 3325>
After the kaupapa inquiry was granted, on February 15, 2024, it was directed that this would be a new record of inquiry, referred to as ‘the Climate Change Priority Inquiry’, with reference number ‘Wai 3325.’ Wai 3325 is ongoing. 

Note: All case documents relating to Wai 3325 are publicly available at:  https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/en/inquiries/kaupapa-inquiries/climate-change-priority-inquiry. 

Wai 3325: Climate Change Priority Inquiry

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Wai 3325: Climate Change Priority Inquiry - order

Filed

New Zealand

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

People with different national or cultural traditions from the dominant population

Social and cultural groups that share collective ancestral ties to the lands and natural resources where they live, occupy or from which they have been displaced

Wai 3325: Climate Change Priority Inquiry - order

Impacted group