Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

South Bronx Unite! v. New York City Industrial Development Agency

South Bronx Unite! v. New York City Industrial Development Agency 

11459New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division (N.Y. App. Div.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
03/27/2014
Decision issued.
The New York Appellate Division affirmed. The decision did not address the respondents' consideration of greenhouse gas emissions or climate change in the environmental review.
Decision

South Bronx Unite! v. New York City Industrial Development Agency 

0260462/2012New York Supreme Court (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/31/2013
Denied petition.
Local residents and community organizations challenged various governmental actions that facilitated the relocation of a grocery delivery service’s operations from Queens to the Bronx in New York City. Among other claims, the petitioners-plaintiffs alleged that environmental review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) had been inadequate, including with respect to consideration of climate change. The court was not persuaded by the challengers’ assertions of inadequacies in the methodologies employed in the environmental review, which found that the project would result in fewer vehicle trips per day than a fully built-out land use plan that had been studied in a 1993 environmental impact statement.  With respect to the challengers’ allegations regarding the lack of consideration of greenhouse gas emissions, the court concluded without discussion that the respondents had established that SEQRA did not require consideration of greenhouse gas emissions in the circumstances presented by this project.
Decision