Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Aerial Spraying of Pesticides and Normative Omission

Geography
Date
2025
Document type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
BrazilFederal Supreme Court
Case category
Suits against governmentsHuman RightsIndigenous GroupsSuits against governmentsProtecting biodiversity and ecosystems
Principal law
BrazilFederal ConstitutionBrazilILO Convention 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (enacted by Decree No. 5.051 of 2004, later revoked by Decree No. 10.088 of 2019)BrazilNational Policy for the Environmental and Territorial Management of Indigenous Lands – PNGATI (Federal Decree No. 7.747 of 2012)BrazilParis Agreement (enacted by Federal Decree No. 9.073 of 2017)
At issue
Whether the absence of clear and protective federal rules regarding the aerial spraying of pesticides violates fundamental rights.

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Summary
Document
04/09/2025
Petition
In Portuguese

Summary

In April 2025, the Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (APIB) filed a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality by Omission (ADO) before the Federal Supreme Court seeking the recognition that the lack of specific federal regulation on the aerial spraying of pesticides constitutes a normative omission incompatible with the 1988 Federal Constitution. APIB argues that the absence of clear and protective rules regarding this practice violates fundamental rights, particularly those related to health, adequate food, the preservation of a balanced environment, and the safeguarding of indigenous lands and ways of life. The petition explicitly emphasizes issues linked to the climate crisis and environmental preservation, highlighting that aerial spraying intensifies ecosystem degradation, threatens biodiversity, and directly compromises the territorial and cultural integrity of indigenous communities, which provide essential environmental services for climate regulation. Brazil ranks among the top users of pesticides globally, with aerial application being one of the primary sources of soil, water, and air pollution, exacerbating socio-environmental inequalities and risks. Given this scenario, as a precautionary measure, APIB requests the immediate suspension of aerial pesticide spraying across the entire national territory. As final requests, APIB asks the Federal Supreme Court to: Declare the unconstitutionality by omission of federal administrative regulations on pesticide spraying (as established by Decree-Law No. 917 of October 7, 1969; Decree No. 86,765 of December 22, 1981; Normative Instruction MAPA No. 2 of January 3, 2008; and Ordinance GM/MAPA No. 298 of September 22, 2021) due to insufficient protection of constitutional rights. Order the Federal Executive Branch to issue administrative measures prohibiting the aerial spraying of pesticides nationwide, whether by manned or unmanned aircraft. Alternatively, as a subsidiary request, APIB demands that the Federal Executive Branch be obligated, within a maximum period of sixty days, to issue regulations establishing exclusion zones or pesticide-free areas (both aerial and ground spraying) around indigenous lands, along with the imposition of daily fines for non-compliance.