- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Pennsylvania
- /
- Bowfin KeyCon Holdings, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Bowfin KeyCon Holdings, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Notice of appeal filed by agencies.
Geography
Docket number
247 MD 2022
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Pa. Commw. Ct.
Case category
State Law Claims → Industry Lawsuits
Principal law
United States → Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control ActUnited States → State Law—Air Statutes
At issue
Challenge to Pennsylvania regulations implementing participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
11/21/2023
Notice of appeal filed by agencies.
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board (EQB) filed a notice of their appeal of the Commonwealth Court’s order declaring their Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) regulation void. The appeal presents the question of whether the RGGI regulation’s CO2 allowances are fees (rather than taxes, as determined by the Commonwealth Court) and thus within the scope of DEP’s and EQB’s granted regulatory authority.
Appeal
–
11/01/2023
Regulation declared void.
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court declared that the Pennsylvania rulemaking that made Pennsylvania a RGGI participant was void because it constituted an unconstitutional tax imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and Environmental Quality Board. The court found that it was undisputed that “significant monetary benefits” were anticipated from participation in the RGGI carbon dioxide allowance auctions; that there was no cited authority for the agencies to obtain or retain auction proceeds for allowances purchased by non-Pennsylvania covered sources, which are not subject to the agencies’ regulatory authority and “not tethered to CO2 emissions in Pennsylvania”; that only 6% of proceeds would be attributable to the costs of administering the program; and that the auction proceeds would exceed total funds appropriated to the agencies “by nearly threefold.” The court found that participation in RGGI would thus generate moneys “grossly disproportionate” to oversight costs and annual regulatory needs and relate to activities beyond the agencies’ jurisdiction. The court held that the regulations therefore were invalid and unenforceable. The court said that RGGI participation “may only be achieved through legislation duly enacted by the Pennsylvania General Assembly.” Three judges did not participate in the case, and one judge dissented, writing that in her view there were genuine issues of material fact at this stage regarding whether the rulemaking established a fee or a tax.
Decision
–
08/25/2022
Opinion issued in support of July 8 and 22 orders regarding bond requirement.
Decision
–
07/08/2022
Petitioner's preliminary injunction granted.
Decision
–
06/06/2022
Brief filed by amici curiae Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association et al. in support of petitioners' application for preliminary injunction.
Amicus Motion/Brief
–
Summary
Challenge to Pennsylvania regulations implementing participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector