- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Minnesota
- /
- Community Members for Environmental Justice v. City of Minneapolis
Community Members for Environmental Justice v. City of Minneapolis
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Case dismissed as untimely.
Geography
Docket number
27-CV-21-13100
Court/admin entity
United States → Minnesota District Court (Minn. Dist. Ct.)United States → State Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Reverse Impact Assessment (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → Minnesota Environmental Policy Act
At issue
Lawsuit challenging the environmental review for redevelopment of the Upper Harbor Terminal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Minneapolis.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
07/27/2022
Case dismissed as untimely.
A Minnesota state court dismissed a lawsuit challenging the City of Minneapolis’s approval of a redevelopment plan for the Upper Harbor Terminal on the west bank of the Mississippi River. The Star Tribune reported that the court found that the lawsuit was filed too late. The plaintiffs’ claims included that the City’s environmental review under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act was inadequate, including because it failed to discuss the project’s contributions to climate change, mitigation of climate change, or the impacts of climate change on the project.
Decision
–
10/28/2021
Complaint filed.
Two environmental groups filed a lawsuit in Minnesota district court challenging the City of Minneapolis’s approval of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for redevelopment of the Upper Harbor Terminal on the west bank of the Mississippi River. (An AUAR is “an accepted alternative form of environmental review for certain kinds of projects.”) The plaintiffs asserted that the City failed to comply with the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act. They sought an order enjoining the City from taking further action related to the project until the AUAR process was complete and an AUAR analysis was deemed adequate. The complaint’s allegations included that the final AUAR was inadequate because it failed to discuss the proposed project’s contributions to climate change, mitigation of climate change, or the impacts of climate change on the proposed project.
Complaint
–
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the environmental review for redevelopment of the Upper Harbor Terminal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Minneapolis.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance