- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. U.S. Department of State
Competitive Enterprise Institute v. U.S. Department of State
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted except as to one document.
Geography
Docket number
1:17-cv-02032
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → D.D.C.
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims → Freedom of Information Act → Lawsuits Brought by Plaintiffs Aligned with Industry Interests
Principal law
United States → Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
At issue
Action to compel production of U.S. Department of State officials' correspondence regarding climate negotiations.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
08/10/2022
Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted except as to one document.
In a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit pending since 2017, the federal district court for the District of Columbia found that the U.S. Department of State properly withheld 34 records regarding communications about how to engage with the public about the legal form of the Paris Agreement. The decision concerned three categories of documents: records involving interactions with the public through the media (including emails about how to respond to a reporter’s questions), records involving interactions with the public through elected representatives (including documents reflecting discussion of how to respond to questions from members of Congress), and drafts of press guidance, talking points, and other similar materials.
Decision
–
09/15/2020
Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment denied and defendant's motion for partial summary judgment granted.
In a FOIA lawsuit brought by Competitive Enterprise Institute, a federal district court in the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Department of State properly withheld a legal memorandum that accompanied an “action memorandum” seeking authorization from the Secretary of State to join the Paris Agreement. The court found that the legal memorandum met the criteria for the deliberative process privilege because it was predecisional and deliberative and did not constitute the “working law” of the State Department. The court rejected CEI’s argument that because a document appearing to be the legal memorandum had been posted on the internet, the memorandum fell outside the FOIA exemption under the “public domain doctrine.”
Decision
–
10/03/2017
Complaint filed.
Competitive Enterprise Instituted (CEI) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Columbia seeking to compel the U.S. Department of State to produce correspondence of two officials related to climate change, the December 2016 Paris Agreement, the “legal form” of the Paris Agreement’s provisions, the Kyoto Protocol, and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The two officials were Todd Stern, the former Special Envoy for Climate Change, and Susan Biniaz, formerly the State Department’s lead climate lawyer. CEI also sought email correspondence between the two officials and people at the Natural Resources Defense Council or World Wildlife Fund.
Complaint
–
Summary
Action to compel production of U.S. Department of State officials' correspondence regarding climate negotiations.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Fossil fuel
Economic sector