- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Ohio
- /
- Concerned Residents of Salem Township v. Stevenson
Concerned Residents of Salem Township v. Stevenson
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Dismissal of appeal of air permit affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
22AP-393 et al.
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Ohio Court of Appeals (Ohio Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States → Ohio Air Pollution Control Law
At issue
Appeals of the dismissal of administrative appeals of a permit authorizing emission of air pollutants at a natural gas booster station.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/27/2023
Dismissal of appeal of air permit affirmed.
The Ohio Court of Appeals rejected appeals by a community group and its individual members of an Environmental Review Appeals Commission’s (ERAC’s) dismissal of challenges to a permit authorizing emission of air pollutants at a natural gas booster station. The court found that the appellants failed to satisfy notice pleading requirements when they raised two assignments of error before ERAC: (1) the permit’s emission limits and requirements did not take existing emissions into consideration and (2) the permit did not account for emissions from a neighboring compressor station and its inadequate limits would cause a public nuisance. To establish that they satisfied the notice pleading requirements for their public nuisance claim, the appellants cited portions of the record that mentioned, among other things, the adverse impacts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. The Court of Appeals said the appellants’ statements were not sufficient to satisfy the pleading requirements, “as they amount only to a description of the detrimental effects of air pollution generally and within this specific community already plagued by the effects of another local facility” and did not set forth specific emission limits or permit conditions that would result in unreasonable risk of harm.
Decision
–
Summary
Appeals of the dismissal of administrative appeals of a permit authorizing emission of air pollutants at a natural gas booster station.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector