- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Arizona
- /
- Ellis v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Ellis v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Motion to dismiss granted with leave to amend two claims.
Geography
Docket number
2:19-cv-01228
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District of Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Case category
State Law Claims → Utility Regulation
Principal law
United States → Arizona Public Utilities and Carriers LawUnited States → Fourteenth Amendment—Equal ProtectionUnited States → Sherman Antitrust Act
At issue
Antitrust class action lawsuit challenging a utility's allegedly discriminatory pricing scheme for electricity for consumers with solar energy systems.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
01/10/2020
Motion to dismiss granted with leave to amend two claims.
Decision
–
05/07/2019
Motion to dismiss filed.
Motion To Dismiss
–
04/23/2019
First amended complaint filed.
An antitrust class action lawsuit filed in the federal district court for the District of Arizona alleged that a public utility took actions “to unlawfully maintain its existing monopoly power over the retail delivery of electricity to customers throughout its service territory … by engaging in anticompetitive conduct designed to eliminate solar energy competition by implementing a discriminatory pricing scheme” that imposed higher electricity rates on consumers with solar energy systems. The complaint’s allegations included that the utility’s price plan “prevents consumers from taking advantage of solar energy systems purchased in order to save money, promote environmental policies, conserve natural resources and promote other beneficial policies realized through the self-generation and use of solar energy” (including reduction of air pollution, water pollution, and greenhouse gases). The complaint asserted claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Arizona Uniform State Antitrust Act, the Arizona Constitution, Arizona’s public utilities statute, and the Equal Protection Claus of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Complaint
–
Summary
Antitrust class action lawsuit challenging a utility's allegedly discriminatory pricing scheme for electricity for consumers with solar energy systems.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector