Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Harris County v. Arkema, Inc.

Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2017
Status
Settlement announced.
Docket number
2017-76961
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsTexas District Court (Tex. Dist. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)Enforcement Cases (US)
Principal law
United StatesRegulations of Harris County, Texas for Floodplain ManagementUnited StatesTexas Clean Air ActUnited StatesTexas Water Code
At issue
Proceeding by Texas county alleging that chemical manufacturer that operated facility that flooded and where chemicals ignited during Hurricane Harvey violated local floodplain regulations and state air and water laws.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
08/27/2024
Settlement announced.
Harris County Attorney Christian D. Menefee announced that the County had settled a lawsuit it brought against a chemical company (Arkema, Inc.) after a fire broke out at the company’s facility during Hurricane Harvey in 2017. The County alleged that the company violated local floodplain regulations and state air and water laws. The $1.1 million settlement required implementation of safety and flood mitigation measures and payment of funds that will go to the County’s general fund and be allocated through the Commissioners Court. The County Attorney’s announcement said the company had constructed a large detention pond, reinforced buildings to withstand flooding, and raised generators out of the floodplain, while also upgrading fire safety to meet current standards. The settlement also required that the company obtain fire safety and flood management permits before operations resume, and that significant releases of pollutants be reported within two hours. The County Attorney stated that “[a]s we continue to face the realities of climate change and the increasing frequency of severe weather events, it’s crucial that facilities housing hazardous materials are thinking about disaster preparedness plans. This settlement with Arkema sets a precedent for how we expect companies to operate and communicate during crises.”
Settlement Agreement
11/16/2017
Petition and application for permanent injunction filed.
Harris County, Texas, filed a petition in state court against Arkema, Inc. alleging, among other things, that a chemical manufacturing facility owned and operated by Arkema did not have required permits under the County’s Floodplain Regulations for one or more structures that sit beneath base flood elevation. As a result of Hurricane Harvey, the facility flooded, causing its primary and backup power to go offline. The County alleged that without refrigeration, the temperatures of certain organic peroxides manufactured at the facility increased to their “self-accelerating decomposition temperatures,” the point at which the chemicals begin a “chemical decomposition process that leads to rapid burning,” leading to fires and unauthorized air emissions. The flooding also resulted in industrial wastewater overflowing wastewater tanks and their containment dikes. The County asserted that Arkema had violated the Texas Clean Air Act and the Texas Water Code. The County sought civil penalties, response costs, and injunctive relief, including ordering an independent third-party audit of the facility’s disaster preparedness and implementation of the auditor’s recommendations and ordering Arkema to obtain all required permits under the Floodplain Regulations.
Petition

Summary

Proceeding by Texas county alleging that chemical manufacturer that operated facility that flooded and where chemicals ignited during Hurricane Harvey violated local floodplain regulations and state air and water laws.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance