- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Hawaii
- /
- In re Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
In re Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Motion to extend stay granted.
Geography
Docket number
1:24-cv-00164
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District of Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Case category
Securities and Financial Regulation
Principal law
United States → Breach of Fiduciary DutyUnited States → State Law—Unjust EnrichmentUnited States → Waste
At issue
Shareholder derivative action against Hawai'i electricity supplier's officers and directors for failing to take actions to mitigate wildlife risks and for misleading public regarding company's readiness for severe weather.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
04/30/2025
Motion to extend stay granted.
Decision
–
04/09/2025
Opposition filed by plaintiffs to motion to extend stay.
Opposition
–
03/10/2025
Memorandum of law filed by nominal defendant Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. in support of its motion to extend stay until decision by the Northern District of California on motion to dismiss in related securities action.
Motion
–
02/06/2025
Notice filed by nominal defendant.
Status Report
–
10/30/2024
Status report filed by nominal defendant.
Status Report
–
08/15/2024
Verified consolidated shareholder derivative complaint filed.
Complaint
–
07/30/2024
Nominal defendant's motion to stay granted in part.
Decision
–
04/08/2024
Shareholder Derivative Action Filed Against Hawaiian Electric in Connection with 2023 Maui Wildfires
Complaint filed.
A shareholder derivative action filed against officers and directors of Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. (HEI), the largest electricity supplier in Hawai‘i, charged that the defendants knew for years before the 2023 Maui wildfires that the areas served by HEI were at risk of severe weather risk and that equipment and safety protocols and procedures were inadequate and that the defendants “failed to implement policies and practices meant to meaningfully mitigate these material risks.” The complaint alleged that the defendants also misled the public regarding HEI’s readiness for severe weather events, with false and misleading statements regarding risk mitigations, adherence to ESG principles, safety protocols and procedures, and equipment maintenance. The complaint included excerpts of statements regarding the company’s consideration of climate-related risks. The complaint alleged that if the defendants “took material risks to the Company seriously,” lives and property lost and damaged during the 2023 Maui wildfires could have been saved. The complaint alleged that HEI’s reputation was “extremely damaged” and that it faces liability for “billions of dollars in damages” resulting from fires, as well as other costs. The complaint asserted counts of breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment.
Complaint
–
Summary
Shareholder derivative action against Hawai'i electricity supplier's officers and directors for failing to take actions to mitigate wildlife risks and for misleading public regarding company's readiness for severe weather.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector