- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Iowa v. Wright
Iowa v. Wright
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Final rule vacated and remanded.
Geography
Docket number
24-1721
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Eighth Circuit (8th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims → Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA)
At issue
Challenge to a U.S. Department of Energy rule that changed the methodology for determining the equivalent petroleum-based fuel economy values for electric vehicles (EVs) to incentivize EV production.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
09/05/2025
Final rule vacated and remanded.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a 2024 final U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) rule that changed the methodology for determining the equivalent petroleum-based fuel economy values for electric vehicles (EVs). The rule preserved and then gradually phased out a “fuel content factor” that “artificially inflates” EVs’ fuel economy to increase adoption of EVs. The Eighth Circuit first found that state petitioners had standing based on allegations that the rule would result in increased energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions because inflating EV fuel economy values would allow car manufacturers to continue to produce less efficient gasoline-powered vehicles while still meeting the fuel economy standards for their fleets. The states alleged that increased greenhouse gas emissions would result in rising sea levels that would erode the sovereign territory of state petitioners with coastlines (Florida, Mississippi, and Texas). The Eighth Circuit found that the alleged injury was particularized and concrete, imminent, traceable to the rule, and redressable by the court. The Eighth Circuit also found that the challenge to the DOE rule was not mooted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s adoption of new, more stringent emissions standards. On the merits, the Eighth Circuit ruled that DOE lacked statutory authority to retain and then phase out the fuel content factor. In addition, the Eighth Circuit ruled that the rule’s methodology for calculating cumulative equivalent fuel economy violated notice-and-comment procedures.
Decision
–
Summary
Challenge to a U.S. Department of Energy rule that changed the methodology for determining the equivalent petroleum-based fuel economy values for electric vehicles (EVs) to incentivize EV production.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector