Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Margate City, New Jersey v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

About this case

Filing year
2014
Status
Motion for preliminary injunction denied.
Docket number
14-cv-7303
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Case category
Adaptation (US)Challenges to adaptation measures (US)
Principal law
United StatesFifth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited StatesState Law—TrespassUnited StatesUniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
At issue
Challenge to dune project planned for city beaches.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
01/15/2015
Motion for preliminary injunction denied.
The federal district court for the District of New Jersey denied without prejudice the City of Margate’s motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the Corps and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) from constructing the dune system. The court found that plaintiffs had shown a likelihood of success on the merits on the issue of whether NJDEP deprived them of procedural due process rights. The court described NJDEP’s decision to proceed with condemnation for the dune project through administrative orders rather than through the Eminent Domain Act’s procedures as “baffling.” The court determined, however, that the awarding of a contract by the Corps would not cause irreparable harm because actual construction would not begin until after NJDEP commenced a condemnation proceeding, which it had agreed to do by April 2015. Nor did the balance of harms or the public interest weigh in favor of an injunction. However, in the event the Corps was prepared to begin construction before the condemnation proceeding was filed, the court said plaintiffs could seek reconsideration.
Decision
11/24/2014
Complaint filed.
The City of Margate, New Jersey commenced a lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to prevent the agencies from commencing a sand dune construction project on the City’s beaches. The City claimed that implementation of the project would violate the U.S. and New Jersey constitutions, would constitute a trespass, and would violate New Jersey law. The complaint also alleged that NJDEP had failed to comply with the requirements of New Jersey’s Eminent Domain Act of 1971.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to dune project planned for city beaches.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Risk
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance