Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Mato Grosso v. Nelson Noboru Yabuta

Geography
Year
2010
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2010
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
BrazilMato GrossoMato Grosso State Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Corporations (Global)Climate damage (Global)
Principal law
BrazilEnvironmental Crimes LawBrazilFederal Constitution of 1988BrazilForest Code (Law No. 12.651 of 2012)BrazilNational Environmental Policy Act (Law No. 6.938 of 1981)International LawUNFCCCParis Agreement
At issue
The Public Prosecutor’s Office seeks the recovery of a degraded area and compensation for collective moral damages due to deforestation in a protected area without authorization from the environmental agency.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results

Summary

On October 27, 2010, the Public Prosecutor's Office of Mato Grosso filed a Public Civil Action (class action) against Nelson Noboru Yabuta, aiming to hold him accountable for environmental damage caused by the degradation of native vegetation. The lawsuit sought urgent injunctive relief, environmental regularization of the Luana I and II farms, and compensation for collective moral damages. The plaintiff accused Yabuta of illegally deforesting 119,584 hectares in a Permanent Preservation Area (APP), in Juara, Mato Grosso, without authorization from the environmental agency. An initial injunction was issued, prohibiting any unlicensed activities on the farms. Subsequently, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering Yabuta to pay 20,000 Brazilian Reais (about USD $4,000) as compensation for collective moral damages resulting from the environmental harm. Both parties appealed. Yabuta argued that the Infraction Notice, which was one of the foundations of the lawsuit, had been annulled. The plaintiff contended that the court should recognize the obligations outlined in the Conduct Adjustment Agreement, a pact made between Yabuta and the state environmental agency, to strengthen its enforcement. On February 21, 2017, the Court of Justice of Mato Grosso dismissed the appeals, upholding Yabuta's conviction and his responsibility to compensate for collective moral damages. The court emphasized that the cancellation of the administrative infraction notice did not absolve him of liability in other domains, as environmental crimes entail triple liability—criminal, administrative, and civil. It was proven that Yabuta had unlawfully deforested the APP and Legal Reserve of the property, disregarding the necessary authorization. His actions, driven by cattle-raising activities, posed a risk of forest desertification, thereby compromising the quality of life for the local population due to climate change and excessive greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs).

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance