On August 4, 2026, the en banc D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the entirety a district court’s April 2025 preliminary injunction that barred the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from effectuating its March 11, 2025 notice of termination of grants under the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA’s) Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). The preliminary injunction also restricted EPA’s ability to suspend or terminate the plaintiffs’ grant awards; restricted defendant Citibank’s ability to move funds out of accounts established in connection with the plaintiffs’ grants; prohibited EPA from influencing Citibank to limit access to funds in such accounts; and required Citibank to disburse funds “properly incurred” before the suspension of the plaintiffs’ funds. The six judges who voted to affirm the injunction were split on the injunction’s scope. Six judges voted to affirm the portion of the injunction enjoining EPA from effectuating its notice of termination because they concluded that (1) EPA’s attempt to terminate the grants and claw back disbursed funds “based solely on a policy disagreement” with Section 60103 of the IRA “likely contravened the IRA’s mandatory appropriation” and (2) EPA did not argue or show it would not still take those steps in the absence of the injunction. Five of those judges would have affirmed the entire preliminary injunction because they concluded that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s (OBBBA’s) repeal of Section 60103 in 2025 “likely does not affect the applicability of Section 60103 to grant funds that were obligated and disbursed” at the time of the OBBBA’s enactment. The sixth judge would have vacated portions of the preliminary injunction because the EPA could not be enjoined to expend funds to administer the program after the OBBBA rescinded the program’s dedicated administrative funds; the sixth judge would have required defendant Citibank to keep funds in the plaintiffs’ accounts in place pending district court determinations on questions regarding EPA’s plans regarding primary grantees’ grant agreements and regarding the OBBBA’s effect on sub-grantees’ funds. Four judges would have vacated the provision barring EPA from effectuating the notice of termination based on their conclusion that the plaintiffs did not establish that the injunction was warranted after the repeal of Section 60103. The en banc court was equally divided as to (1) whether following the OBBBA’s enactment, EPA’s authority to suspend or terminate the grants was limited by both IRA Section 60103 and contractual terms or only by contractual terms and (2) whether any of the district court’s remaining grounds for the preliminary injunction would provide a basis for affirmance. Additional analysis of the decision is available in this Climate Law Blog <a href="https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2026/08/07/a-big-win-in-few-words-what-to-glean-from-the-climate-united-fund-decision/">post</a>.

Lawsuits challenging EPA's freezing and purported termination of funding under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.

Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

En Banc D.C. Circuit Affirmed Preliminary Injunction Blocking EPA Termination of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Grants but Did Not Offer Consensus Rationale

Filed

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

En Banc D.C. Circuit Affirmed Preliminary Injunction Blocking EPA Termination of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Grants but Did Not Offer Consensus Rationale

Impacted group

Finance